BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

slowing the growth or damaging

Expert replies

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:42 am
Stacey Koprince wrote:Oh, I see how they explained it. Yes, you could read it that way too (and, grammatically, you have to, actually), because "damaged" and "slowed" are parallel.

I was reading it based upon what I knew the meaning should be, logically. The original sentence is trying to discuss two possible effects of acid rain: slowing the growth of forests and damaging those same forests.

D says:
what role is played by acid rain in [damaged or slowed] growth of forests.

or = parallelism signal
the two -ed words are parallel and function as adjectives; they apply equally to the next noun (growth):
what role is played by acid rain in damaged growth
what role is played by acid rain in slowed growth

Now, because of the parallelism, I have "damaged growth" but the original sentence didn't say the growth was damaged. It just said the forests were damaged. (Well, potentially damaged - that's the debate, of course.)

(Note: and if you wanted to read it as "damaged" applies to forests, then you'd have "what role is played by acid rain in damaged forests" - which is also wrong, as I noted before. Either way, it's wrong. :))

In E, we've got:
what role is played by acid rain in [damaging or slowing the growth of] forests.

or = parallelism signal
the two -ed words are parallel and function as nouns this time (gerunds); they each apply equally to the rest of the sentence:
what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing <the growth of> forests

Now, you're actually describing the actions potentially taking place: damaging and slowing. "the growth of" is just extra modifying info. Slowing what? Slowing the growth.
Hi Stacey,

Actually I am a bit confused....why damaged and slowed can be interchanged in D but damaging and slowing cannot be interchanged....I am able to see only one diff i.e. "the"....can you please tell what diff. does it create ?

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:57 pm
I think I understand what you're saying. Yes, you could interpret it as "damaged forests" and "slowed growth of forests" - but then you still have a meaning problem. What role acid rain plays in damaged forests - that makes it sound like the forests were already damaged by something else, before the acid rain came along. That's not the intention - the intention is to say that the acid rain is (potentially) causing damage - or damaging the forests.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:16 pm
Stacey Koprince wrote:I think I understand what you're saying. Yes, you could interpret it as "damaged forests" and "slowed growth of forests" - but then you still have a meaning problem. What role acid rain plays in damaged forests - that makes it sound like the forests were already damaged by something else, before the acid rain came along. That's not the intention - the intention is to say that the acid rain is (potentially) causing damage - or damaging the forests.
Hi Stacey,

Thanks. But probably I was not clear in my last post....

OG says:

"Choice D also changes the meaning of the sentence by making both damaged and slowed refer to growth."

i.e. as per OG this is what D becomes:
what role is played by acid rain in damaged growth of forests
or slowed growth of forests.

As per OG the above is wrong....probably because( this is my own interpretation.....not given by OG :-)...) "damaged growth" is wrong.

But why the same is not the case with E ? why damaging cannot refer to growth in E ? i.e. why E is not interpreted like
what role is played by acid rain in damaging the growth of forests
or slowing the growth of forests.

Basically why E does not have the same problem as of D ? If we see D Vs E...there are only two differences:
i) "ing" form.
ii) addition of "the".....
I am not sure how the addition of "ing" or "the" places the odds in favour of E as compared to D.....

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:11 am
"damaged or slowed growth of forests" - the "or" means parallelism, and the two words that are parallel are the adjectives "damaged" and "slowed", right? Those are adjectives - they can't stand alone. So both have to apply to whatever noun immediately follows ( in this case, "growth").

"damaging or slowing the growth of forests" - now, the word "the" in front of growth means "the growth of" can now just be additional words applying to the main -ing word "slowing." So, both -ing words are now free to apply to "forests."
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:54 am
Stacey Koprince wrote: "damaging or slowing the growth of forests" - now, the word "the" in front of growth means "the growth of" can now just be additional words applying to the main -ing word "slowing." So, both -ing words are now free to apply to "forests."
Thanks Stacey. But why can't the damaging and slowing apply to "the growth of forests" as single unit ?

Why "the growth of" and "forests" become two units in case of E and not in D ?
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:46 am
So, try both answers both ways.

damaged growth and slowed growth. No good - wrong meaning

damaged forests and slowed growth of forests. No good - wrong meaning.

damaging the growth and slowing the growth. No good - wrong meaning

damaging forests and slowing the growth of forests. Correct, original meaning. Fine.

You can technically interpret each of these either way. But only one interpretation actually works correctly.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by way2ashish » Sat May 04, 2013 7:41 pm
Correct Answer = A
Join the discussion