BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Better GMAT? - Lower well Rounded vs. higher one-sided

Launched April 26, 2006
Expert replies
by janssen88 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:55 pm
There may be something like this here already, but I thought I'd go ahead and post (please point me to another thread if one exists).

Which do you think is better? A higher GMAT score that is heavily weighted by one section, or a lower score that is well rounded. For example:

690- 44Q 40V (my score)

- vs. -

710- 48Q 38V or
710- 50Q 37V

I'm obviously asking due to my situation, but am curious to hear what others think or know based on their experience.

Best of luck to everyone!
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Stacy Blackman |

by gwendolinecn » Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:30 pm
Since 700 is a dividing line, I believe the latter looks better.
Join the discussion

by Lisa Anderson » Tue Sep 09, 2008 12:01 pm
Dear janssen88,

I think your current score is a great score for two reasons: it's a 690 and it is balanced. While there is something nice to having a score that starts with a 7, and some schools are not as concerned with a balance between Q & V as others, it is probably not as significant a difference as you think. There is not much difference between a 690 and a 710. Having said that, it is important to have a high enough score on each section to demonstrate the aptitude to succeed in the program.

Good luck,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by janssen88 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:17 pm
Thanks Stacy! I'm pretty comfortable with my score now, but I thought the topic might spark some debate as there are a lot of folks who fall on each side of topic. Appreciate the feedback...
Join the discussion