Global warming

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:55 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members

Global warming

by metallicafan » Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:01 pm
Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out that the scientific community remains divided on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.

A. on whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does.
B. on whether warming that occurs will be significant and the impact it would have
C. as to whether significant warming will occur or the impact it would have if it did
D. over whether there will be significant warming or the impact it will have
E. over whether significant warming will occur and what impact it would have

OA is __E__.

In choice E, are "whether significant...occur" and "what impact...have" noun phrases? According to the structure of the sentence, they must be noun phrases because they come after a preposition (over), and only noun and noun phrases can follow a preposition.
However, both don't seem noun phrases:
Can "whether + clause" be a noun phrase?
Also, I cannot identify what kind of structure "what impact it would have" is. It seems a clause. Is "what" working as a pronoun in this sentence? :s
Finally, they don't seem parallel at all, but "AND" requires parallelism.

Please, your comments.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:53 pm
Hi metallicafan,

Sentence Corrections become easier to solve if you can more than just one of the rules that occur in the sentence (and the "splits" that appear in the answer choices.)

For this SC, here's what I noticed:
1) The idiom "divided...."; stylistically, I prefer the phrase "divided...over", which would narrow things down to D and E. For the sake of argument, let's pretend that you don't know this rule.
2) The "intent" is that the scientific community is divided over BOTH IDEAS, so the word AND would be required. Eliminate C and D.
3) The modifying word "significant" should be right in front of the word "warming" Eliminate B
4) Between A and E, A is clunky ("and what impact will it have if it does.").
5) Answer E parallels "warming will occur" with "it would have" - The noun/pronoun and future verbs are both parallel.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:28 am
GMAT Score:21 V

by bhakk » Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:31 am
Answer 1:
This sentence has 5 clauses:
1) Those skeptical of the extent of global warming argue
2) that short-term temperature data are an inadequate means of predicting long-term trends and point out
3) that the scientific community remains divided on
4) whether significant warming will occur
5) and what impact will it have if it does.

SVA in each clause:
1) Since subject is plural (extent of global warming) verb is also plural (argue).
2) that (subject) refers to extent of global warming - and verb (are)
3) that here refers to short term temperature data and verb (remains)
4) significant warming - is the subject and will is the verb.
5) what impact (subject) and will (verb)


However, the 4-5 clause is a cause and effect and refers of uncertainty, so 5-clause will have 'would' in it.

Ans 2: whether significant warming will occur and what impact will it have if it does
is a dependent clause. Remember a dependent clause can begin with either a relative pronoun or with relationship words such as since, because, whether, if etc.

Ans 3: i have no idea what is what!

Answer choice:
Now between B, C and E (because of unconditional statement - presence of would).. E is correct because of Divided Over.

• Page 1 of 1