BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Divisible by 3

Expert replies
by akhilsuhag » Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:10 pm
Is the tens digit of a three-digit positive integer p divisible by 3?

(1) p-7 is a multiple of 3

(2) p-13 is a multiple of 3
Please press "thanks" if you think my post has helped you.. Cheers!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:28 pm
akhilsuhag wrote:Is the tens digit of a three-digit positive integer p divisible by 3?

(1) p-7 is a multiple of 3

(2) p-13 is a multiple of 3
Note:
0 is considered divisible by EVERY POSITIVE INTEGER.

Statement 1: p-7 is a multiple of 3
Make a list of options for p-7:
p-7 = 93, 96, 99, 102, 105...

Adding 7 to each value in the list, we get the following options for p:
p = 100, 103, 106, 109, 112...

If p=100, then its tens digit is 0, which is divisible by 3.
If p=112, then its tens digit is 1, which is NOT divisible by 3.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: p-13 is a multiple of 3
Make a list of options for p-13:
p-13 = 87, 90, 93, 96, 99...
Adding 13 to each value in the list, we get the following options for p:
p = 100, 103, 106, 109, 112...

Both statements yield the same list of options for p.
Implication:
Even when the two statements are combined, it's possible that p=100 (in which case its tens digit is divisible by 3) or that p=112 (in which case its tens digit is NOT divisible by 3).
Thus, the the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:29 pm
akhilsuhag wrote:Is the tens digit of a three-digit positive integer p divisible by 3?

(1) p-7 is a multiple of 3
(2) p-13 is a multiple of 3
Target question: Is the tens digit of a three-digit positive integer p divisible by 3?

IMPORTANT: When I scan the two statements, I see that they both tell me the SAME THING.
There's a rule that says: If N and K are both divisible by d, then N+K and N-K are also divisible by d.

OBSERVE: p-13 is 6 less than p-7. In other words, (p-7) - 6 = p-13

Statement 1 tells us that p-7 is divisible by 3, and we know that 6 is divisible by 3. So, by the above rule, p-13 must be divisible by 3.

When two statements provide the SAME information, we can conclude that the correct answer will be either D or E.

Statement 1: p-7 is a multiple of 3
There are several values of p that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: p = 139, in which case p-7 = 132, and 132 is divisible by 3. In this case, the tens digit of p (3) IS divisible by 3
Case b: p = 118, in which case p-7 = 111, and 111 is divisible by 3. In this case, the tens digit of p (1) is NOT divisible by 3
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: p-13 is a multiple of 3
We already learned that statements 1 and 2 provide the SAME information. So, if statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT, we know that statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

If you're not convinced, check out these two conflicting cases:
Case a: p = 139, in which case p-13 = 126, and 126 is divisible by 3. In this case, the tens digit of p (3) IS divisible by 3
Case b: p = 118, in which case p-13 = 105, and 105 is divisible by 3. In this case, the tens digit of p (1) is NOT divisible by 3
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Since both statements are not sufficient, and since both statements provide the SAME information, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:47 am
Consider the value p = ABC where A,B,C are the three digits.
Working backwards, firstly, for B to be a multiple of 3, it can only be 3, 6 or 9.

So, these are possibilities:
p = A3C, A6C, A9C

If we subtract 7 (= -10 + 3)we get:
p = A2C+3, A5C+3, A8C+3
For p to be a multiple of 3, then the sum of all digits must be a multiple of 3
As A and C are both undefined, then Statement A is NOT SUFFICIENT

Instead if we subtract 13 (= -10 - 3)we get:
p = A2C-3, A5C-3, A8C-3
For p to be a multiple of 3, then the sum of all digits must be a multiple of 3
As A and C are both undefined, then Statement A is NOT SUFFICIENT

Combined statements will still leave A and C undefined. NOT SUFFICIENT>

Answer = (E)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:52 am
Mathsbuddy wrote: Working backwards, firstly, for B to be a multiple of 3, it can only be 3, 6 or 9.
Hey Mathsbuddy,

You're absolutely right about the answer being E, but be careful. If B is a multiple of 3, then B can equal 0, 3, 6 or 9

Zero is a multiple of all integers. Likewise, zero is divisible by all integers.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:05 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Mathsbuddy wrote: Working backwards, firstly, for B to be a multiple of 3, it can only be 3, 6 or 9.
Hey Mathsbuddy,

You're absolutely right about the answer being E, but be careful. If B is a multiple of 3, then B can equal 0, 3, 6 or 9

Zero is a multiple of all integers. Likewise, zero is divisible by all integers.

Cheers,
Brent
Thanks Brent, I did wonder if I should have included zero!
However, as it is not sufficient for the other values, it's sufficiency for zero becomes obsolete.
Nonetheless, I haven't totally convinced myself if 'working backwards' is 100% valid!
Join the discussion