An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
Shouldnt More be followed by Than
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:55 pm
I am not a grammar expert,but here is my take
more x than y construction is only needed if a comparison is intended. However, if more is just being used as an adverb, modifying an adjective, then it can stand by itself.
more x than y construction is only needed if a comparison is intended. However, if more is just being used as an adverb, modifying an adjective, then it can stand by itself.
- BlindVision
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:39 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
Amundasingh123 wrote:An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
Life is a Test
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Take this from an Expertranjit_ece wrote:I am not a grammar expert,but here is my take
more x than y construction is only needed if a comparison is intended. However, if more is just being used as an adverb, modifying an adjective, then it can stand by itself.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/need-expert- ... tml#398834
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In B, D and E, staff (singular) does not agree with are (plural).mundasingh123 wrote:An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
In C, the omission of more changes the meaning, implying parents are LIKELY -- not just MORE likely -- to recommend the childcare center. Eliminate C.
The correct answer is A.
In another thread I suggested that we should be skeptical of an answer choice that includes more without than. The reason is that the omission of than can leave the comparison unclear. To illustrate:
John has more money.
Does John have more money THAN MARY? More money THAN CHOCOLATE? More money today than HE HAD YESTERDAY? Each of these meanings is possible.
No such ambiguity exists in the SC above. The conditional clause makes the comparison clear: parents are MORE likely to recommend a childcare center to others IF THE STAFF IS PERCEIVED AS APPROACHABLE [than if the staff is NOT perceived as approachable]. The bracketed portion is omitted, but its presence is clearly implied.
Bottom line: when an SC makes a comparison -- with or without than -- make sure it's clear what is being compared.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:In B, D and E, staff (singular) does not agree with are (plural).mundasingh123 wrote:An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
In C, the omission of more changes the meaning, implying parents are LIKELY -- not just MORE likely -- to recommend the childcare center. Eliminate C.
The correct answer is A.
In another thread I suggested that we should be skeptical of an answer choice that includes more without than. The reason is that the omission of than can leave the comparison unclear. To illustrate:
John has more money.
Does John have more money THAN MARY? More money THAN CHOCOLATE? More money today than HE HAD YESTERDAY? Each of these meanings is possible.
No such ambiguity exists in the SC above. The conditional clause makes the comparison clear: parents are MORE likely to recommend a childcare center to others IF THE STAFF IS PERCEIVED AS APPROACHABLE [than if the staff is NOT perceived as approachable]. The bracketed portion is omitted, but its presence is clearly implied.
Bottom line: when an SC makes a comparison -- with or without than -- make sure it's clear what is being compared.
It's a nice explanation but I have a doubt i.e during the exam time when already there is lots of pressure due to time constraints how can one get to know about the best strategy of solving these questions because the very first time when I read the sentence I thought that there is no than in the sentence and therefore more x than y is not being followed so I rejected option A and went for C
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Aside from what I said above, remember the following:aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:In B, D and E, staff (singular) does not agree with are (plural).mundasingh123 wrote:An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
In C, the omission of more changes the meaning, implying parents are LIKELY -- not just MORE likely -- to recommend the childcare center. Eliminate C.
The correct answer is A.
In another thread I suggested that we should be skeptical of an answer choice that includes more without than. The reason is that the omission of than can leave the comparison unclear. To illustrate:
John has more money.
Does John have more money THAN MARY? More money THAN CHOCOLATE? More money today than HE HAD YESTERDAY? Each of these meanings is possible.
No such ambiguity exists in the SC above. The conditional clause makes the comparison clear: parents are MORE likely to recommend a childcare center to others IF THE STAFF IS PERCEIVED AS APPROACHABLE [than if the staff is NOT perceived as approachable]. The bracketed portion is omitted, but its presence is clearly implied.
Bottom line: when an SC makes a comparison -- with or without than -- make sure it's clear what is being compared.
It's a nice explanation but I have a doubt i.e during the exam time when already there is lots of pressure due to time constraints how can one get to know about the best strategy of solving these questions because the very first time when I read the sentence I thought that there is no than in the sentence and therefore more x than y is not being followed so I rejected option A and went for C
PRESERVE THE INTENDED MEANING OF THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE.
In the SC above, omitting more changes the intended meaning. The correct answer must preserve the comparison being made in the original sentence. Eliminate C.
The following SC reverses the situation:
In this case, the answer choices that ADD more change the intended meaning, since the original sentence is NOT making a comparison. Eliminate C, D and E.Publishers of travel guides for families typically suffer weak Januaries, because vacation budgets are low and efforts to save are intense as families plan for the calendar year ahead.
(A) low and efforts to save are intense as families plan
(B) low and their efforts to save are intense as they plan
(C) low with more intense efforts to save in planning
(D) low, while efforts to save are more intense to plan
(E) low, while their efforts to save are more intense in planning
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
thanks a lot Mitch for your explanationGMATGuruNY wrote:Aside from what I said above, remember the following:aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:In B, D and E, staff (singular) does not agree with are (plural).mundasingh123 wrote:An American study about childcare has found that parents are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is perceived as approachable.
(1)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(2)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff are
(3)
are likely to recommend a childcare center to others if the staff is
(4)
are more likely to recommend childcare centers to others if the staff are
(5)
are more likely to recommend a childcare center if staff are
In C, the omission of more changes the meaning, implying parents are LIKELY -- not just MORE likely -- to recommend the childcare center. Eliminate C.
The correct answer is A.
In another thread I suggested that we should be skeptical of an answer choice that includes more without than. The reason is that the omission of than can leave the comparison unclear. To illustrate:
John has more money.
Does John have more money THAN MARY? More money THAN CHOCOLATE? More money today than HE HAD YESTERDAY? Each of these meanings is possible.
No such ambiguity exists in the SC above. The conditional clause makes the comparison clear: parents are MORE likely to recommend a childcare center to others IF THE STAFF IS PERCEIVED AS APPROACHABLE [than if the staff is NOT perceived as approachable]. The bracketed portion is omitted, but its presence is clearly implied.
Bottom line: when an SC makes a comparison -- with or without than -- make sure it's clear what is being compared.
It's a nice explanation but I have a doubt i.e during the exam time when already there is lots of pressure due to time constraints how can one get to know about the best strategy of solving these questions because the very first time when I read the sentence I thought that there is no than in the sentence and therefore more x than y is not being followed so I rejected option A and went for C
PRESERVE THE INTENDED MEANING OF THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE.
In the SC above, omitting more changes the intended meaning. The correct answer must preserve the comparison being made in the original sentence. Eliminate C.
The following SC reverses the situation:
In this case, the answer choices that ADD more change the intended meaning, since the original sentence is NOT making a comparison. Eliminate C, D and E.Publishers of travel guides for families typically suffer weak Januaries, because vacation budgets are low and efforts to save are intense as families plan for the calendar year ahead.
(A) low and efforts to save are intense as families plan
(B) low and their efforts to save are intense as they plan
(C) low with more intense efforts to save in planning
(D) low, while efforts to save are more intense to plan
(E) low, while their efforts to save are more intense in planning
Hi, I have read staff - plural in many places.
"Staff are"
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/opini ... brary.html
Please help , how to distinguish.
"Staff are"
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/opini ... brary.html
Please help , how to distinguish.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
From the link above:jaguar123 wrote:Hi, I have read staff - plural in many places.
"Staff are"
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/opini ... brary.html
Please help , how to distinguish.
...LIBRARIES with top-notch staff ARE needed now...
The subject of ARE (plural) is LIBRARIES (plural). With top-notch staff is a prepositional phrase modifying libraries.
The GMAT considers collective nouns -- such as staff -- singular.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:19 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:2 members
Publishers of travel guides for families typically suffer weak Januaries, because vacation budgets are low and efforts to save are intense as families plan for the calendar year ahead.
(A) low and efforts to save are intense as families plan
(B) low and their efforts to save are intense as they plan
(C) low with more intense efforts to save in planning
(D) low, while efforts to save are more intense to plan
(E) low, while their efforts to save are more intense in planning
hello mitch
please refer to the above question. here i've chosen A. because in B, their has an ambiguous referent. please correct me if i am wrong.
best regards nafi