-
ankit0411
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:53 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:4 members
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their
clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to
something ingested, but in attributing criminal or
delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the
perpetrators are in effect told that they are not
responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to
some food allergy,
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed toan allergy to some food,
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or
delinquent to an allergy to some food,
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause ocriminal or delinquent behavior,
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of
criminal or delinquent behavior,
Can anyone help me with the explanation of this question ? The OA is B
clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to
something ingested, but in attributing criminal or
delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the
perpetrators are in effect told that they are not
responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to
some food allergy,
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed toan allergy to some food,
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or
delinquent to an allergy to some food,
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause ocriminal or delinquent behavior,
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of
criminal or delinquent behavior,
Can anyone help me with the explanation of this question ? The OA is B












