Evaluate Argument type question method

shoot4greatness wrote:Hi ya'll,

Just have a small q. Is it ok to accept "new" infos in evaluating argument questions or do we only accept stated infos in stimulus?

in weaken and strenghten questions new info is highly welcome as long as it weakens the link or supports it.
But in must-be-true, draw a conclusion, and assumptiom questions it is NOT! We have to stay within the text given!

The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test!

Quote

shoot4greatness: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 100; Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:57 pm; Thanked: 2 times

by shoot4greatness » Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:14 pm

I'm not concerned about weakening or must be true. Those two are different types. I am specifically asking evaluating the argument type questions. Thanks for your input though.

Quote

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

5/5

5 Star (480 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review