Prohibitionland

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:43 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Prohibitionland

by pareekbharat86 » Mon Nov 18, 2013 8:31 am
The people of Prohibitionland are considering banning the service of alcoholic beverages in restaurants to curb unruly behavior on the part of its residents. Proprietors of restaurants in Prohibitionland are protesting the ban on the grounds that it will reduce their revenues and profits. However, several provinces in Prohibitionland enacted restrictions on alcoholic beverages last year, and the sales taxes paid by the restaurants in those provinces rose by an average of 50 percent. In contrast, the sales taxes paid by restaurants located in areas of Prohibitionland that did not have any restrictions rose by an average of 30 percent.

Which of the following, if true, supports the restaurant proprietors' economic stance against the ban?

a. In the provinces that restricted alcoholic beverages, there was a short-term negative impact on restaurant visitation in the beginning of last year.

b. The sales tax in Prohibitionland is lower on food and beverages than it is on other consumer goods, such as clothing.

c. The consumption of alcoholic beverages in Prohibitionland has been on a gradual decline the last 20 years.

d. The restrictions on alcoholic beverages enacted last year allowed for the service of drinks beginning around dinnertime each evening.

e. Overall sales tax revenue did not increase at a substantially higher rate in the provinces that enacted the restrictions on alcoholic beverages than in the rest of Prohibitionland last year.

OA is D.

Source- MGMAT
Thanks,
Bharat.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:34 am

by theunheardmelody » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:36 am
Good question....I chose D for the following reasons.

The point here is to find a reason to support the proprietors of restaurants by negating the statment which states that by banning alochoholi beverages the sales (sales tax) actually increased. If option D were true then we still allow those beverages to be sold which could have contributed to the increase in sales.

In other words we negate the assumption that banning alcohol had a postive effect on a commercial side as implied in the statement.

Hope this helped..

Thanks