RC - "EXCEPT"

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

RC - "EXCEPT"

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:24 pm
In 1958, Jack Kilby invented the integrated circuit and ushered in the modern computer era. For the first time, using a semiconductor substrate, complete electronic circuits could be miniaturized and mass produced, ultimately leading to the advent of affordable consumer electronics. Unlike discrete circuits, integrated circuits contain a large number of transistors over a relatively small area. A greater number of transistors per circuit allows for faster processing speeds and more memory. Since the early 1960s, advances in photolithography and miniaturization have led to a doubling every two years in the number of transistors that can be cheaply placed on a single integrated circuit. In 1970, a typical integrated circuit could hold around two thousand transistors. In 2008, that number reached two billion. This consistent exponential increase in transistors per circuit and the consequent parallel improvement in computer processing speed and memory has been dubbed "Moore's Law" in honor of computer scientist Gordon Moore, the man who identified the trend.

Perhaps the most marvelous aspect of Moore's Law is its consistency. When Moore and other computer scientists identified the trend in 1965, they believed that the steady doubling of transistors per circuit could not continue much longer than roughly ten years. Instead, the pattern has continued through five decades. Though there have been a number of predictions as to when the trend will finally cease, a broad consensus among engineers and scientists asserts that the trends associated with Moore's Law will finally die out just before 2020. According to these same experts, by then transistors will have become so small as to begin approaching the size of atoms, and at that point will no longer be capable of processing basic logic functions integral to a computer's performance.

Nevertheless, there is reason to believe that Moore's Law may continue decades into the future. Futurist and computer scientist Ray Kurzweil points out that the most important trend identified by Moore's Law is not the increasing number of transistors per integrated circuit, but rather the exponential growth in computing power relative to cost. He argues that even if manufacturers reached a natural physical limit for miniaturized and parallel processing integrated circuits, new technologies, such as quantum computers, could maintain power-to-cost ratio aspect of Moore's Law. Given the number of unexpected new technological paradigms that have invalidated predictions of Moore's Law's demise since the 1960s, there is reason to support such a conclusion.

The passage suggests that all of the following statements about integrated circuits are true EXCEPT


(A) Today a single integrated circuit can hold billions of transistors.

(B) A computer's processing speed is influenced by the number of transistors per integrated circuit.

(C) Discrete circuits cannot be used to attain the faster processing speeds of integrated circuits.

(D) Miniaturization of transistors on integrated circuits has led to the creation of cheaper and more powerful computers.

(E) There is a finite amount of transistors that can be placed on a single integrated circuit
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 214 times
Followed by:19 members
GMAT Score:740

by Birottam Dutta » Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:09 am
I think E is the answer. This is suggested by the last part of the passage where it is said that even if physical limitations are reached, new advancements like quantum computers may improve on power to cost of computers.

All others are stated in the passage.

Hope E is the correct answer.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:49 pm
E - is stated in the passage indirectly and not contradicted anywhere. If there have been a number of predictions as to when the trend will finally cease, then the logical conclusion is that there is a "finite amount of transistors that can be placed on a single integrated circuit." The passage implies that transistors can only be made so small before they cease to properly function. This limit on size naturally imposes a limit on the number that can be placed on a circuit. Even Kurzweil does not rebut the argument of computer scientists and engineers who believe that there is a limit to transistor miniaturization; he just suggests a way around the limit.

Will post the answer OA after couple of threads...


Birottam Dutta wrote:I think E is the answer. This is suggested by the last part of the passage where it is said that even if physical limitations are reached, new advancements like quantum computers may improve on power to cost of computers.

All others are stated in the passage.

Hope E is the correct answer.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:50 pm
Instead of clicking the "quote" i clicked the "thank" button. Sorry about that
Birottam Dutta wrote:I think E is the answer. This is suggested by the last part of the passage where it is said that even if physical limitations are reached, new advancements like quantum computers may improve on power to cost of computers.

All others are stated in the passage.

Hope E is the correct answer.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:12 pm
Thanked: 339 times
Followed by:49 members
GMAT Score:770

by eagleeye » Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:26 pm
The correct answer should be C. Let me explain:

We need to find the one which is NOT suggested. Let's look at the choices.

(A) Today a single integrated circuit can hold billions of transistors.
The passage indeed suggests this. "In 2008, that number reached two billion". INCORRECT

(B) A computer's processing speed is influenced by the number of transistors per integrated circuit.
The passage suggests this as well. "A greater number of transistors per circuit allows for faster processing speeds and more memory" INCORRECT

(C) Discrete circuits cannot be used to attain the faster processing speeds of integrated circuits.
This is the right answer. While this option may seem "wrong", let's pay close attention to the language of what was proposed in the passage.
"Unlike discrete circuits, integrated circuits contain a large number of transistors over a relatively small area. A greater number of transistors per circuit allows for faster processing speeds and more memory."
This statement suggests that
(i): The discrete circuits do not have a large number of transistors over a small area.
(ii): Integrated circuits have a large number of transistors over a small area.
(iii): The large number of transistors per circuit lead to faster speeds.

This does NOT preclude the discrete circuits from performing as fast as the integrated circuits. If we have a large enough area for discrete circuits, we might very well be able to attain the faster speeds. Hence CORRECT.

(D) Miniaturization of transistors on integrated circuits has led to the creation of cheaper and more powerful computers.
The passage suggests this as well. INCORRECT.

(E) There is a finite amount of transistors that can be placed on a single integrated circuit
The passage suggests this also.
First, the broad consensus among the engineers and scientists is that, there is a limit on how many transistors that can be placed on an integrated circuit.
Second, even the critic of the popular theory of the engineers and scientists, regarding the "natural physical limit" forever, also agrees that on reaching the physical limit, newer technologies will keep the power/cost ratio aspect of Moore's Law going. Hence there is a physical limit to how many transistors you can put on a circuit (deeming it a finite number). INCORRECT.

Let me know if this helps :)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:00 pm
OA is C
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:27 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

by sandeep_thaparianz » Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:35 am
Agree with C