BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

A Motion

Expert replies
by sk8ternite » Tue Aug 18, 2009 9:59 am
A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was collected in a manner inconstant with the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures.

a. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
b. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, and they rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
c. After reviewing a motion filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
d. After reviewing a motion, filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
e. After a motion filed by the prosecution was reviewed by a panel of judges, who rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:12 am
IMO C
OA pls?? :?:
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:51 am
is it C?
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:13 am
B IMO. OA plz
Join the discussion

Re: A Motion

by shahdevine » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:16 am
sk8ternite wrote:A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was collected in a manner inconstant with the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures.

a. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
b. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, and they rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
c. After reviewing a motion filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
d. After reviewing a motion, filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
e. After a motion filed by the prosecution was reviewed by a panel of judges, who rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
LMAO is A.
I'd go A...C was close for me...but "rules" violates verb tense. I don't like A because some of the referents are slightly ambiguous...but its the best choice.
Join the discussion

Re: A Motion

by sk8ternite » Tue Aug 18, 2009 11:26 am
sk8ternite wrote:A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was collected in a manner inconstant with the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures.

a. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, ruling that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
b. A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges, and they rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
c. After reviewing a motion filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
d. After reviewing a motion, filed by the prosecution, a panel of judges rules the evidence cannot be used in the trial because of being
e. After a motion filed by the prosecution was reviewed by a panel of judges, who rule that the evidence cannot be used in the trial because it was
OA is C. I chose A, but the explanation is that ruling is not a proper verb construction. I thought ruling was modifying the clause "A motion filed by the prosecution has been reviewed by a panel of judges", but now I realize that ruling modifies "a motion filed by the prosecution" because it is the subject so we need something after "a panel of judges" such as "that ruled". Is this correct?
Join the discussion

by mruzeful » Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:44 am
A is wrong..

more help on why it's wrong at
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-modifier ... 38943.html
Join the discussion

by sk8ternite » Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:40 pm
mruzeful wrote:A is wrong..

more help on why it's wrong at
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-modifier ... 38943.html
mruzeful, can you shed some light to why you think it is wrong?
Join the discussion

by capnx » Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:38 pm
"A" is wrong bc "ruling" as a present participal modifies the preceding clause's subj&predicate, in this case: "a motion...has been reviewed". Since it's not the motion that did the ruling but the judges, A makes a wrong modification.
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:33 am
IMO -- C
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by ranell » Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:53 pm
The answer is A.
C is incorrect as After reviewing a motion filed by the prosecution is gramatically incorrect in GMAT. GMAT usually uses a full sentence after "after", not gerund
A is the best answer
Join the discussion

by pradeepsarathy » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:57 pm
One more for C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1