BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep 2- Quant 5

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:26 am
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:660

by Sher1 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:44 pm
The answer is B and this is how.

We have to see if n is odd.

St1: n can divisible by 3 and still be even. eg. 3,6,9,12.....
no enough

St2: 2n is divisible by twice as many number as by n. This is only possible if n is odd.

eg. if n=4; 2n=8 and they would both be divisible by only 2

if n=9 2n=18, now 2n is divisible by both 2 and 3 vs. only 3 with n.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:55 pm
Picking a few numbers and seeing a patttern is a good way to solve.

Conceptually this is what happens:

If n was even 2 would be one of its factor and so is 1 (1 is a factor of every integer)

If u mutliply by 2 each of the factors the factors will not double since 2*1 =2 is already a factor of n so 2n misses out on the double the factors part

So n cant be even


If n was odd then all its factors are odd.

When u multiply by 2 each odd factor of n u get a new even factor for 2n thereby doubling its factors (even*odd=EVEN)


Hope this helps too!

Regards,
CR
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:32 pm
Excellent explanation cramya,
I couldnt have explained better.

B for me as well

rgds
-V
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:06 am
Thanked: 3 times

by Baldini » Mon May 18, 2009 5:04 am
I just came across this question, and got the right OA.
However reading the explanation above (Cramya's in particular) I am a little confused.

If n = 3, then its factors are 1 and 3 (thus it has 2 factors). So 2n = 6, and its factors are 1,3 and 2. But this does not mean that 2n is "divisible by twice as many positive factors", as you have 3 factors now instead of 2.

So for me, the only answer to this question is when n = 1, as the only factor it has is 1, and therefore 2n = 2 has 2 factors.

Can someone please tell me how I have misinterpreted the question?
Thanks
GMAX
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon May 18, 2009 6:05 am
Baldini wrote: If n = 3, then its factors are 1 and 3 (thus it has 2 factors). So 2n = 6, and its factors are 1,3 and 2. But this does not mean that 2n is "divisible by twice as many positive factors", as you have 3 factors now instead of 2.

So for me, the only answer to this question is when n = 1, as the only factor it has is 1, and therefore 2n = 2 has 2 factors.

Can someone please tell me how I have misinterpreted the question?
6 has four factors (1, 2, 3, and 6), not three.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1