BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Nubians

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:43 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by ri2007 » Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:03 am
Ans should be

B.
Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.

Here is my logic -


Fact - ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual
evidence of this disease.

Reason for not finding the desease is assumed to be the deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic.

it is assumed that tetracycline, was consumed thro bread and beer and it was effective in controlling the desease. So Tetracycline should remain effective evev after exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:53 am
Thanked: 2 times

by jan08 » Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:15 pm
IMO D..coz the conclusion states: "tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubian"

the only assumption here could be that the food comprises of beer and bread and nothing else....

OA please?
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:15 am

by nauman » Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:27 pm
IMO B is the answer. typhus is common in the area where Nubian lived, however they used the tetracycline in beer and bread which is not effective to control typhus.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

by optimisticsam » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:40 pm
Good explanation by Santosh.

B should be OA, I have seen this question elsewhere.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by sibbineni » Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:19 am
I think nauman pointed the correct answer but wrong conclusion... that
tetracycline is not effective in controlling the typhus, if that the case the answer is not (B)


here is my explanation....

Conclusion:

tetracycline in their food was effective in controlling the typhus.

Premise:

It states that tetracycline flourish on the dried grain unites the beer and bread which is the nubian diet.


(B) indicates that tetracycline is effective as an antibiotic in controlling the typhus as it is contained in the nubian diet which is the bread and beer.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:58 am
(B) is definitely the correct answer.

An assumption is something that the author is taking for granted as being true. In other words, an assumption is a missing but necessary link between the evidence and the conclusion.

Therefore, the correct answer to an assumption question is something that MUST BE TRUE in order for the argument to make sense.

To summarize the argument:

Evidence:

Nubians don't seem to have had typhus; and
The grain that Nubians used in their bread contains an antibiotic.

Conclusion:

The antibiotic is responsible for the lack of Typhus.

Let's look at (B):

"Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer."

Does this have to be true for the conclusion to make sense? Definitely!

A great way to check answer choices for assumption/strengthening/weakening questions is to use Kaplan's denial test. We look at the opposite of a choice and see what impact it has on the argument.

In this case, let's consider how persuasive the conclusion would be if (B) were NOT true:

"Tetracycline IS rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer."

Well, if the brewing/baking process renders Tetracycline ineffective, then how could it possibly have been keeping the Nubians typhus-free?

Since the denial of (B) renders the argument nonsensical, (B) itself must be true for the argument to make sense.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Tue May 10, 2016 2:53 am
i think answer B is better
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1