BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

1000 SC Ques 23

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times
by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:16 am
23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city’s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to


IMO : E becoz they have no ref in a,b,c,d. Am i right?
In reasoning
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:01 pm
Location: mumbai
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:640

by stubbornp » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:26 pm
imo E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:13 pm

by jessica.ng1988 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:51 am
IMO: E
Parallelism
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 25 times

by aj5105 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:12 am
E...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:15 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 7 times

Re: 1000 SC Ques 23

by anju » Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:52 am
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city’s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to


IMO : E becoz they have no ref in a,b,c,d. Am i right?
In reasoning
E for parallelism:
"failing to replace" parallel to "failing to investigate"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:20 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Onell » Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:11 pm
anju wrote:
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city�s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to


IMO : E becoz they have no ref in a,b,c,d. Am i right?
In reasoning
E for parallelism:
"failing to replace" parallel to "failing to investigate"

I agree with others that E might be the best answer.
But my question is,

election board for, first of all, failing to .... second, for failing...

Here if I am not wrong, "For" is not needed after the word "second" because the "for" after the word "board" is applicable for both first and second reasons as it is a parallel construction.

Could anyone please explain, why do we need another "for" .
Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 amFollowed by: 123 members
Thanked: 378 times
GMAT Score:760

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon Nov 15, 2010 1:26 am
Onell wrote:
anju wrote:
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city�s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to


IMO : E becoz they have no ref in a,b,c,d. Am i right?
In reasoning
E for parallelism:
"failing to replace" parallel to "failing to investigate"
while the second 'for' may be redundant, it's not grammatically wrong to put it there. In a long sentence with many clauses in the middle, it might be even stylistically preferable to place it there - otherwise, 'and second, failing...' is a too abrupt throwback to the beginning of the parallel construction way back at the beginning of the sentence. I believe that it's too close to call here - meaning that you should not see an answer choice which is the same in every way as E, but merely omits the second 'for', since the decision between a complete parallel construction Vs. the conciseness principle is not clear cut. At the end of the day, we choose E because the other answer choices have the problematic plural pronoun with no plural noun to be referred to.


I agree with others that E might be the best answer.
But my question is,

election board for, first of all, failing to .... second, for failing...

Here if I am not wrong, "For" is not needed after the word "second" because the "for" after the word "board" is applicable for both first and second reasons as it is a parallel construction.

Could anyone please explain, why do we need another "for" .
Thanks.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:36 am
Thanked: 6 times

by kapur.arnav » Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:00 pm
vivek.kapoor83 wrote:23. A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city�s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.
(A) secondarily, for their failure to
(B) secondly, for their failure to
(C) secondly, that they failed and did not
(D) second, that they failed to
(E) second, for failing to


IMO : E becoz they have no ref in a,b,c,d. Am i right?
In reasoning
editorial board should be singular...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1