-
overhaulife1990
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:17 am
- Thanked: 1 times
I heard once in one GMAT training institution (let's call it A)that a singular pronoun can not be used to refer a plural antecedent.
For instance, the melting points of most metallic elements are hundreds of degrees above the room temperature, but that of mercury is below the freezing point of water.
Here, in the second clause, the author omitted the phrase 'the melting point' and put 'that' instead.
This way is wrong because the author use a singular pronoun 'that' to refer the antecedent, which, in this case, is the melting points.
BUT I saw this sentence in another institution(institution B)'s tutoring video. and It's a correct expression, according to this video.
I'm confused in this paradox, please tell me which one is nearer to the truth.
For instance, the melting points of most metallic elements are hundreds of degrees above the room temperature, but that of mercury is below the freezing point of water.
Here, in the second clause, the author omitted the phrase 'the melting point' and put 'that' instead.
This way is wrong because the author use a singular pronoun 'that' to refer the antecedent, which, in this case, is the melting points.
BUT I saw this sentence in another institution(institution B)'s tutoring video. and It's a correct expression, according to this video.
I'm confused in this paradox, please tell me which one is nearer to the truth.












