BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

A good SC Question

Expert replies
by Ozlemg » Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:28 am
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray
Last edited by Ozlemg on Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by cans » Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:47 am
IMO A
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by sivaelectric » Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:48 am
IMO C
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:51 am
Hi,
IMO A
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by g.shankaran » Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:59 am
IMOA
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:04 am
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced x-ray emission --> the second modifier 'having...' incorrectly modifies the first modifier.
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, --> 'which...' modifies x-ray emission without modifying the technique
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it, --> same as C
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-ray --> called photon x-ray should be placed after technique
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by cans » Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:44 am
A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission
Isn't this part also incorrect??
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:48 am
cans wrote:A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-ray emission
Isn't this part also incorrect??
Hi,
Yes. That part is incorrect as well. I haven't mentioned all the mistakes in each of the options.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1