Nightmare!!!!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

Nightmare!!!!

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:57 pm
Took me 2 min 46 seconds to arrive at correct answer

Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?


The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.

The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.

When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.

Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.

Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.

OA Coming soon
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:07 pm
I picked D though I thought B was close too.. Ruled out B because it generalises the relationship too much , far beyond Canada and Pacific Northwest .. But I may be totally wrong :)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:08 pm
How much time you took?
debmalya_dutta wrote:I picked D though I thought B was close too.. Ruled out B because it generalises the relationship too much , far beyond Canada and Pacific Northwest .. But I may be totally wrong :)
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:13 pm
Took 2 mins 32 secs

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:21 pm
What's the source of this question? I am asking because I tried solving it, but to me it seems like it would be really hard to get the right answer choice. I see there is an implied relationship between precipitation and water-table levels and moisture, in the sense that these terms are somehow similar. However, since this is not explained in the question itself, you'd have to have more technical knowledge of the stuff - which is not required on the GMAT.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:25 pm
This question has been discussed on BTG forum and owner claims that this is from Princeton Review material. Below is the link

https://www.beatthegmat.com/inference-t13819.html

I did this question using POE and any option other than D is not related to the passage. Therefore, I choose D. But this is really very hard passage.

Hope I won't see such kind in GMAT test.
DanaJ wrote:What's the source of this question? I am asking because I tried solving it, but to me it seems like it would be really hard to get the right answer choice. I see there is an implied relationship between precipitation and water-table levels and moisture, in the sense that these terms are somehow similar. However, since this is not explained in the question itself, you'd have to have more technical knowledge of the stuff - which is not required on the GMAT.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)