Search found 9 matches


I think it may be easier if you tear up the problem into smaller bits. For this particular one, you must find g(2) and g(x) first. g(x) is given. => 1/g(x) = (x - 1) / (x^2 + 2) g(2) = ((2^2) + 2)/(2-1) = 6 => 1/g(2) = 1/6 So, 1/g(2) * 1/g(x) = (1/6) * (x-1)/(x^2 + 2) So, the 6 must be in the denomi...

by bajjuri6

Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:27 pm
Forum: Problem Solving
Topic: function malfunction
Replies: 6
Views: 1451

can someone pls explain why C is wrong Option C is wrong on subject-verb agreement. "plans" refers to a verb associated with a singular noun, but "their" is a possessive pronoun representing a plural subject. The right answer IMO is A. I think the catch here is the capitalized &...

by bajjuri6

Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:34 am
Forum: Sentence Correction
Topic: SC - Question from Aristotle SC grail
Replies: 6
Views: 2192

Algebra

In the decimal representation of x, where 0 < x < 1, is the tenths digit of x nonzero?
(1) 16x is an integer.
(2) 8x is an integer.

by bajjuri6

Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:37 pm
Forum: Data Sufficiency
Topic: Algebra
Replies: 2
Views: 878

if Y = MX + C is the equation of the line with slope M and y-intercept C, M = (Y-C)/X

As C increases, M decreases.

IMO B

by bajjuri6

Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:09 pm
Forum: Data Sufficiency
Topic: coordinate
Replies: 4
Views: 1163

88 fps = 60 mph => 40 miles trip is completed in 40 mins 1) If T = 30, trip is not completed in T hours If T = 41, trip is completed in T hours different answers for different values of T. NOT SUFFICIENT 2) For T > 45, the trip will be completed in T hours not matter what the value of T is. IMO B

by bajjuri6

Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:01 pm
Forum: Data Sufficiency
Topic: word problem
Replies: 2
Views: 781

I think A is the best option. B == There is no text supporting this claim. C == Since the whales moved back and forth between ocean-water and fresh-water, it's unlikely that the fossils couldn't be found at the intersection D == This could a candidate answer. I can't come up with an idea to reject t...

by bajjuri6

Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:25 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Whale Origin
Replies: 3
Views: 1597

The conclusion generalizes the findings in Rheus Monkeys across ALL monkey species. So, if we can prove that some monkeys behave differently than Rheus Monkeys, we start talking. I suppose option C provides the best evidence that not ALL monkeys behave the same way as Rheus monkeys.

-Pallav

by bajjuri6

Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:12 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Rhesus Monkey
Replies: 7
Views: 1753

Choice B) seems to the most logical answer: the objective is to prove that naltrexone (N) is not harmful to bacteria. If all N does is inhibit Morphine (M) from triggering the bacteria, it does not harm the bacteria directly. So, it's not harmful to the bacteria, it's simply not helpful to it.

by bajjuri6

Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:55 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Naltrexone and Morphine
Replies: 4
Views: 1735

The objective here is to undermine Scott's theory that the decline in numbers is due to shortage of prey. Choice A best defies this argument by presenting an example of another species with similar characteristics.

by bajjuri6

Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:33 pm
Forum: Critical Reasoning
Topic: Songbird Migration
Replies: 5
Views: 1644