anthropologists

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

anthropologists

by ketkoag » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:32 am
Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists’ strategy?
(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.
(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.
(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.
(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.
(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:14 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ManuGMAT » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:42 pm
IMO A

Because the conclusion is the approach taken by anthropologists is flawed. This means they cannot draw anything from the studies.

A. says that the study is still meaningful because there are still similarity between Forager societies. Hence, it weakens the conclusion of the critic

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:18 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ansumania » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:17 pm
hi,

Pl. explain why can't "E" be the answer.

regards,

Ansumania

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:31 am

by kaushals » Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:16 pm
IMO A is the only option. Rest all strengthen the conclusion.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:20 am
Thanked: 2 times

by ansh.kumar » Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:31 pm
hiiiii. ^e^ does strengthen the critics against the anthropologist studies thats why it is wrong.