Charlotte Perkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
1>Of course, we need "for" before clustered suburban houses. Eliminate A.
How you guys select among the rest? Which one is better? Why the others are wrong?
a>urban apartment houses including child-care facilities
b>urban apartment houses that included child-care facilities
c>urban apartment houses with child-care facilities
d>urban apartment houses to include child-care facilities
2>for the use of "including", do we usually need to put a comma before including?
3>with sth. included incorrect idiom?
OA - D Thank you.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
1>Of course, we need "for" before clustered suburban houses. Eliminate A.
How you guys select among the rest? Which one is better? Why the others are wrong?
a>urban apartment houses including child-care facilities
b>urban apartment houses that included child-care facilities
c>urban apartment houses with child-care facilities
d>urban apartment houses to include child-care facilities
2>for the use of "including", do we usually need to put a comma before including?
3>with sth. included incorrect idiom?
OA - D Thank you.












