BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Greeks BF

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Sun May 09, 2010 9:06 am
Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the
eighth century B.C., a strong case can be made that the Greeks actually adopted
alphabetic writing at least two centuries earlier. Significantly, the text of these
earliest surviving Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and
sometimes from left to right.
Now, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the
Phoenicians, and in the process they would surely have adopted whatever
convention the Phoenicians were then using with respect to the direction of
writing.
Originally, Phoenician writing ran in either direction, but by the eighth century
B.C. it had been consistently written from right to left for about two centuries.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks
to establish; the second is that position.
B. The first provides evidence in support of the position that the argument seeks
to establish; the second presents an assumption on which that argument relies.
C. The first is an assumption that the argument concludes is unjustified; the
second presents part of the grounds for that conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that
the argument seeks to establish; the second is that position.
E. The first is evidence that forms the basis for an objection to the position that
the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment that is introduced in
order to call into question the relevance of that evidence.
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ssgmatter » Sun May 09, 2010 9:11 am
My take on this one

regarding A and B--> first BF description is common in both....however i m confused with the second BF description..please help

c-->first BF is not assumption and nothing is unjustifies in the argument so wrong

d-->there is no objection as suggested by first BF so wrong

e-->same as d
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by ansumania » Sun May 09, 2010 7:54 pm
OA pl. ....

I am trying to understand the seond one too.....
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sun May 09, 2010 8:26 pm
I wud go for B

argments position is :Greeks actually adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries earlier than eighth century B.C
second one is an assumption to supposrt the argument that how the change occured
OA pls
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion

by amitverma22 » Sun May 09, 2010 11:19 pm
The first bold faced is a fact and hence it is an evidence(and surely not an assumption).

The second bold faced starts with, "they would have surely ...." . The "would have.." phrase represents a strong assumption.

He would have gone. This means that I assume he must have gone.

Answer B
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon May 10, 2010 10:36 pm
Assumptions are never stated in a argument.
So B and C are out.

A, D : Second is not the main position, so out.

so IMO : E

What is OA ?
Join the discussion

by vineetbatra » Wed May 12, 2010 4:06 pm
I would go with B too, I do agree that assumption cannot be part of an argument but I do not see any other choice.

A - the conclusion of the argument or position is "a strong case can be made that the Greeks actually adopted
alphabetic writing at least two centuries earlier". The second boldface is not the position

E - The position is NOT "Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the
eighth century B.C" this is a fact. First BF is a support to the Conclusion and so is the 2nd boldface.

Any expert on this?
Join the discussion