BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

An international convention .....

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:27 pm
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:710

An international convention .....

by buzzdeepak » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:16 pm
An international convention regulating trade in endangered species, especially bears and tigers, could be significantly weakened were it not for restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(A) could be significantly weakened were it not for restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.
(B) could be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species aren't eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.
(C) couldn't be significantly weakened without restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species being eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.
(D) can't be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species are eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.
(E) could be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species are eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

I got stuck between B and E....went with B but the OA is E. Please help....

Thanks in advance,
Deepak
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:19 pm
Just to make things easier to parse:

An international convention regulating trade in endangered species, especially bears and tigers, could be significantly weakened were it not for restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(A) could be significantly weakened were it not for restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(B) could be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species aren't eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(C) couldn't be significantly weakened without restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species being eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(D) can't be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species are eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.

(E) could be significantly weakened if restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species are eased, warn conservation and animal welfare groups.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:23 pm
The biggest issue with B and E is meaning.

B says that the convention could be weakened if restrictions are NOT eased, while E says that the convention could be weakened if restrictions are eased.

Which makes more sense? Well, if restrictions on captive breeding are eased, then there may be more endangered animals bred, which would increase the available supply and make regulating trade of such animals harder to regulate.

If the restrictions are NOT eased (i.e. kept the same), then there should be no impact on the convention.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:04 am

by Practicegmat » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:57 pm
Could you please explain why (a) is wrong .

I can say that the international convention could be significantly weakened if it was not for
restrictions on captive breeding of endangered species, but for something else.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:55 am
Answer choice A is wrong because the verb tenses do not make sense together. "Could be weakened" implies that the weakening hasn't happened yet, but could in the future. "Were it not" is a conditional about what would have happened in a different scenario. For example, "Were it not for the snowstorm, the school would be open" means that there is a snowstorm, and the school isn't open. But if there weren't a snowstorm, the school would be open.

We can't use "could be weakened" and "were it not" together. We would have to say "would have been weakened were it not..."

Just a note about SC questions in general... the GMAT never uses contractions such as "couldn't" or "aren't" on real SC problems. If you see contractions on practice questions, it could indicate that those practice questions aren't very indicative of the real thing.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1