SC: Subjunctive

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

SC: Subjunctive

by stop@800 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:53 pm
Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:54 am
Thanked: 10 times

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by wonder » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:18 pm
stop@800 wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and


ok, here we go -:
We should know a thumb rule that 'so as' is incorrect on the gmat. so A and B are out.

Now, our usage is X requires Y to do something
OR
X requires that Y do something

Here, we are using the former one, so we need to have a 'to' after "requiring certain employers".....its correctly provided in D. the "so that" also correctly shows that it is the reason why the bill requires employers to give the unpaid leaves...

hoping it helps:)
Last edited by wonder on Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:14 am
in D
I think they can refer to employers or to workers.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:47 am
IMO: D

A rule of thumb, the pronoun should refer to the immediate antecedant noun. In this example they refers to 'workers'.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:35 am
Thanked: 2 times

by HarvardDreamin » Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:19 am
Hmmm, i went with B. Whats the original answer??
ON MY WAY TO HBS......

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:09 pm
The OA is D but IMO it is incorrect.
A and B are out because of so as to.
C and D are out because of they.

E:
Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave and care for sick or newborn children.
Wrong because
how can employers provide with care for sick or newborn children.


banker1,

A rule of thumb, the pronoun should refer to the immediate antecedant noun. In this example they refers to 'workers'.

I am not sure about this Rule.
I think it should not hold true.

The very first sentence I read for prononun reference was:
A studied with B so that he may pass the exam.
Who may pass the exam: A or B????

Please comment!!

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:22 am

by callmemo » Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:45 pm
I concur with Stop@800. Anyone there to clarify?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by logitech » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:12 pm
stop@800 wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and
Require X to do something

Require THAT X do something

A, C and E are out

Between B and D, so as to is not idiomatic so B is out

Is they a little unclear ? Yes it is - but Does Employer or Workers take care of their children with unpaid leave ? Of course workers
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by stop@800 » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:38 pm
logitech wrote:
stop@800 wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and
Require X to do something

Require THAT X do something

A, C and E are out

Between B and D, so as to is not idiomatic so B is out

Is they a little unclear ? Yes it is - but Does Employer or Workers take care of their children with unpaid leave ? Of course workers
logitech,
Can we assume this?

I think no.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by logitech » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:46 pm
stop@800 wrote:
logitech wrote:
stop@800 wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and
Require X to do something

Require THAT X do something

A, C and E are out

Between B and D, so as to is not idiomatic so B is out

Is they a little unclear ? Yes it is - but Does Employer or Workers take care of their children with unpaid leave ? Of course workers
logitech,
Can we assume this?

I think no.
I don't think we are assuming . But we are more like making an inference.

The birds have long wings, but they could not escape from the eagle.

Who did not escape ?

Do I make any sense here ?

:oops:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by stop@800 » Tue Nov 11, 2008 7:53 pm
logitech wrote:
stop@800 wrote:
logitech wrote:
stop@800 wrote:Congress is debating a bill requiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to care for sick or newborn children.

A provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
B to provide workers with unpaid leave so as to
C provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they
D to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can
E provide workers with unpaid leave and
Require X to do something

Require THAT X do something

A, C and E are out

Between B and D, so as to is not idiomatic so B is out

Is they a little unclear ? Yes it is - but Does Employer or Workers take care of their children with unpaid leave ? Of course workers
logitech,
Can we assume this?

I think no.
I don't think we are assuming . But we are more like making an inference.

The birds have long wings, but they could not escape from the eagle.

Who did not escape ?

Do I make any sense here ?

:oops:
I understand, if we apply mind it sounds logical.
but as per my understanding, we are not suppose to.

I will reread my notes and will get back.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: SC: Subjunctive

by logitech » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:05 pm
stop@800 The Man wrote: I will reread my notes and will get back.


Please let us know Stop! Thank you.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:59 am
Received a PM asking me to reply. I don't see a source listed above; please cite the source and I will be happy to reply!
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:37 am

by er_priyankajolly » Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:46 pm
Stacey Koprince wrote:Received a PM asking me to reply. I don't see a source listed above; please cite the source and I will be happy to reply!
Its OG 10 Question Number 67.

Also please let us know why so as to is unidiomatic ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:48 pm
Stacey Koprince wrote:Received a PM asking me to reply. I don't see a source listed above; please cite the source and I will be happy to reply!
I chose B because "they" in option D is ambiguous.. Can you please let me know why D is the rite option?