That is supposed to refer to jingle dress dance here.
While this sentence is not grammatically incorrect, it would be better to place the modifier near to what it modifies. An alternative construction might be -
The jingle dress dance, which originated in Minnesota, is a traditional dance of the Ojibwa people.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
What is this "that" refers to and why?
Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction |
Oh you are right, that's OA! But I don't know why "that" is not Ojibwa people. Could you help me out?niksworth wrote:That is supposed to refer to jingle dress dance here.
While this sentence is not grammatically incorrect, it would be better to place the modifier near to what it modifies. An alternative construction might be -
The jingle dress dance, which originated in Minnesota, is a traditional dance of the Ojibwa people.
If the intention of the author were to refer to Ojibwa people, he / she would have used the relative pronoun who instead of that.
scio me nihil scire
Are yeah! Thank you very much, now I get the important point. I highly appreciate your answers.niksworth wrote:If the intention of the author were to refer to Ojibwa people, he / she would have used the relative pronoun who instead of that.












