-
schumi_gmat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
42. Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
a)..
(b) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(c)suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving
(d) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolving
(e) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved
I know this question is discussed in this forum. I was able to get the correct answer. But question is the usage of "Evidence that suggests" v/s "evidence to suggest"
Can somebody help me understand?
a)..
(b) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(c)suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving
(d) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolving
(e) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved
I know this question is discussed in this forum. I was able to get the correct answer. But question is the usage of "Evidence that suggests" v/s "evidence to suggest"
Can somebody help me understand?
