BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

According to some analysts

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:45 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Boston
Thanked: 20 times
GMAT Score:720
by stormier » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:03 am
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.


A its merits, the proposal to tax
B its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
C its merits as a proposal, taxing
D the proposal's merits, to tax
E the proposal's merits are, taxing


Please explain all answers !
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Tue Dec 14, 2010 8:18 am
I was really stumped by this one, but I selected (A), mostly because of the phrase "...if enacted".

The "disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment" would result if something is enacted.
What can be enacted? Laws, policies, regulations...proposals?

This is where I differentiated between the act of taxing - in of itself - and the proposal to tax.
Is taxing being enacted, or is that the result of a proposal that has been enacted?
I went with the latter, so I eliminated (C), (D), and (E). I was left with (A) and (B) because I concluded that a direct reference to a proposal was needed as the basis for the later phrase "...if enacted".

Of (A) and (B), I thought "proposal to tax" was more idiomatically correct than "proposal of taxing", and I didn't think "may be" was necessary after "its merits".

Let the onslaught of disagreement begin!
I'm really old, but I'll never be too old to become more educated.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:36 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by winner's attitude » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:05 am
I think the answer should be E

A its merits, the proposal to tax --- to be verb is required and its is again a prob
B its merits may be, the proposal of taxing - its is a prob
C its merits as a proposal, taxing - its is a problem
D the proposal's merits, to tax -- to tax is wrong
E the proposal's merits are, taxing -- correct , to be verb are and taxing away xyz becomes subject

pls correct me if i am worng
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:45 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Boston
Thanked: 20 times
GMAT Score:720

by stormier » Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:02 pm
I think Tomada hit the nail on the head.

Although I do not have an official explanation, the correct answer is A. The key is to have a correct modifying phrase for - if enacted.

,taxing away ......, if enacted is incorrect. It should read - , the proposal to tax ......, if enacted,

Discussions are welcome.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:45 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Boston
Thanked: 20 times
GMAT Score:720

by stormier » Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:07 pm
winner's attitude wrote:I think the answer should be E

A its merits, the proposal to tax --- to be verb is required and its is again a prob
B its merits may be, the proposal of taxing - its is a prob
C its merits as a proposal, taxing - its is a problem
D the proposal's merits, to tax -- to tax is wrong
E the proposal's merits are, taxing -- correct , to be verb are and taxing away xyz becomes subject

pls correct me if i am worng
Why is "its" a problem. I think it clearly refers to the proposal without ambiguity.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:21 pm
Location: Karachi, Pakistan
Thanked: 7 times

by Salman Ghaffar » Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:06 pm
The key here lies in "if enacted"

Option A - "The proposal to tax" can be enacted.
B - "the proposal of taxing" is incorrect.
C, D, E - "taxing" or "to tax" cannot "be enacted"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1