BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC Practice question #20

Expert replies
by missionmba » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:31 am
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.


that they can appeal to when their cases are

to which to appeal after their cases have been

for appealing if their case has been

to which they can appeal if their case is

that their cases can appeal, if they have been
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by iwill » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:17 am
IMHO C..
Join the discussion

by 2008 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:19 am
IMO either A or C... but i would go for A
Join the discussion

by loki.gmat » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:49 am
B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
Join the discussion

by nitin86 » Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:55 pm
loki.gmat wrote:B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
@loki.gmat

i don't agree with the reason you have given for D to be incorrect

"Case is ..." is correct as the sentence says ".....plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court....."

the use of "such" direct us to use singular...

experts comments please
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:40 pm
whats wrong with D??


Is there anything grammatically incorrect in D???

wats d oa??
Join the discussion

Re: SC Practice question #20

by kiranlegend » Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:56 pm
missionmba wrote:Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.


that they can appeal to when their cases are

to which to appeal after their cases have been

for appealing if their case has been

to which they can appeal if their case is

that their cases can appeal, if they have been
IMO A.. it uses appeal to properly...
Join the discussion

by studying_for_MBA » Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:18 am
I also think that the correct answer is D.
plaintiffs are plural but each of the plaintiff has a singular case. From the point of view of tense ' has been decided' looks correct. 'if' has been used as a condition which is also correct. 'appeal to' is the correct idiomatic form: appeal to SOMEBODY


In other choices A,B,D plural form incorrect, C suffers from incorrect idiom for appealing (appealing is generally used like : you might find this appealing).
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:14 am
my pick is D as well eventhough I'm still not so sure about the singular "case" . I'm going with D since it's concise and the "if ..then.." clause is more gramaticla with proper tense usage.

if their case is decided in lower courts.....(then)they will have no higher court to ....
Join the discussion

by missionmba » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:30 am
loki.gmat wrote:B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
I agree with loki.gmat

IMO: A

"plaintiffs in such cases" suggests that what comes next should be plural.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:57 am
that they can appeal to when their cases are -- IMO --the answer.

to which to appeal after their cases have been --to which to appeal --wordy.

for appealing if their case has been--has to be cases as many plantiffs have different cases & not a single common case.

to which they can appeal if their case is --has to be cases as many plantiffs have different cases & not a single common case.


that their cases can appeal, if they have been --cases cant appeal.
Join the discussion

by dileepsinha » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:15 am
A is the right answer
D shows a wrong use of infinitive. "to" has to follow"appeal"...hence "to which they can appeal" is wrong. "which they can appeal to" would have been right.
Join the discussion

by dileepsinha » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:17 am
On second thoughts, "which they can appeal to" would also have been wrong, as "which" would have been used in a restrictive sence.
D is wrong altogether
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1