BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

SC Practice question #20

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: Bombay, India
by missionmba » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:31 am
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.


that they can appeal to when their cases are

to which to appeal after their cases have been

for appealing if their case has been

to which they can appeal if their case is

that their cases can appeal, if they have been
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:590

by iwill » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:17 am
IMHO C..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:09 am
Thanked: 4 times

by 2008 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:19 am
IMO either A or C... but i would go for A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 6 times

by loki.gmat » Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:49 am
B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:00 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by nitin86 » Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:55 pm
loki.gmat wrote:B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
@loki.gmat

i don't agree with the reason you have given for D to be incorrect

"Case is ..." is correct as the sentence says ".....plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court....."

the use of "such" direct us to use singular...

experts comments please
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:40 pm
whats wrong with D??


Is there anything grammatically incorrect in D???

wats d oa??
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 340
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:09 am
Location: India
Thanked: 6 times

Re: SC Practice question #20

by kiranlegend » Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:56 pm
missionmba wrote:Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.


that they can appeal to when their cases are

to which to appeal after their cases have been

for appealing if their case has been

to which they can appeal if their case is

that their cases can appeal, if they have been
IMO A.. it uses appeal to properly...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:44 am

by studying_for_MBA » Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:18 am
I also think that the correct answer is D.
plaintiffs are plural but each of the plaintiff has a singular case. From the point of view of tense ' has been decided' looks correct. 'if' has been used as a condition which is also correct. 'appeal to' is the correct idiomatic form: appeal to SOMEBODY


In other choices A,B,D plural form incorrect, C suffers from incorrect idiom for appealing (appealing is generally used like : you might find this appealing).
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:00 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by ildude02 » Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:14 am
my pick is D as well eventhough I'm still not so sure about the singular "case" . I'm going with D since it's concise and the "if ..then.." clause is more gramaticla with proper tense usage.

if their case is decided in lower courts.....(then)they will have no higher court to ....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: Bombay, India

by missionmba » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:30 am
loki.gmat wrote:B - "to which to" awkard construction.hence incorrect.
C - "appealing" usage of present continous tense is incorrect here.
D - " case is" singular usage is incorrect here bcoz plantiffs is plural.
E - "their cases can appeal" changes the meaning of the sentence.

hence IMO A.


Thanks!
I agree with loki.gmat

IMO: A

"plaintiffs in such cases" suggests that what comes next should be plural.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 25 times

by aj5105 » Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:57 am
that they can appeal to when their cases are -- IMO --the answer.

to which to appeal after their cases have been --to which to appeal --wordy.

for appealing if their case has been--has to be cases as many plantiffs have different cases & not a single common case.

to which they can appeal if their case is --has to be cases as many plantiffs have different cases & not a single common case.


that their cases can appeal, if they have been --cases cant appeal.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:47 am
GMAT Score:690

by dileepsinha » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:15 am
A is the right answer
D shows a wrong use of infinitive. "to" has to follow"appeal"...hence "to which they can appeal" is wrong. "which they can appeal to" would have been right.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:47 am
GMAT Score:690

by dileepsinha » Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:17 am
On second thoughts, "which they can appeal to" would also have been wrong, as "which" would have been used in a restrictive sence.
D is wrong altogether
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1