- karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
An experimental device that is being clinically tested does not need to comply with the safety standards that apply to an approved device, for determining whether a company has produced a device that is safe would be impossible if the company were held liable for causing the problems that the clinical test was designed to detect.
(A) An experimental device that is being clinically tested does not need to comply with the safety standards that apply to an approved device, for determining whether a company has produced a device that is safe would be impossible if the company were held liable for causing
(B) The reason that the safety standards that apply to an approved device do not have to be complied to by an experimental device in clinical testing is that determining whether a company has produced a safe device is impossible if it was held liable for the cause of
(C) As it is being clinically tested, an experimental device does not need to comply to the safety standards that are applicable to an approved device, because to determine whether a company has produced a device that is safe would be impossible if the company is held liable for causing
(D) An experimental device, in its clinical testing, does not need to be in compliance with the safety standards applying to an approved device, determining whether a company is producing a device that is safe is impossible if it is held liable to cause
(E) There are safety standards that apply to an approved device that an experimental device that is being clinically tested does not have to comply with them, in that determining whether a company has produced a safe device will be impossible if the company is held liable to cause
(A) An experimental device that is being clinically tested does not need to comply with the safety standards that apply to an approved device, for determining whether a company has produced a device that is safe would be impossible if the company were held liable for causing
(B) The reason that the safety standards that apply to an approved device do not have to be complied to by an experimental device in clinical testing is that determining whether a company has produced a safe device is impossible if it was held liable for the cause of
(C) As it is being clinically tested, an experimental device does not need to comply to the safety standards that are applicable to an approved device, because to determine whether a company has produced a device that is safe would be impossible if the company is held liable for causing
(D) An experimental device, in its clinical testing, does not need to be in compliance with the safety standards applying to an approved device, determining whether a company is producing a device that is safe is impossible if it is held liable to cause
(E) There are safety standards that apply to an approved device that an experimental device that is being clinically tested does not have to comply with them, in that determining whether a company has produced a safe device will be impossible if the company is held liable to cause
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---












