Q 26 SC OG-12

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:47 am

Q 26 SC OG-12

by aditya1984 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:58 am
Emily Dikinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dikinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's Brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

Ans as per OG:
Dikinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in1886, outnumber

As per modifier rule a noun modifier must touch it, but here "which" is not touching "letters".Can any body explain why still this is correct answer?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:19 am
If antecedent is un-ambigious as is the case here uses of which is correct, as which can not refer to a person u need who for that
aditya1984 wrote:Emily Dikinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dikinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's Brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

Ans as per OG:
Dikinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in1886, outnumber

As per modifier rule a noun modifier must touch it, but here "which" is not touching "letters".Can any body explain why still this is correct answer?
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:41 am
Location: Washhington, DC
Thanked: 8 times

by jk2010 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:42 pm
The clause "which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in1886" is a noun modifier of "letters". The catch is, the modifying clause is NOT essential to identifying the letters. The beginning of the sentence tells you exactly which letters are discussed...Emily Dickenson's letters.

You could say THESE letters. THESE is an essential modifier to describe exactly the letters in question. Therefore, the modifier, separated by a comma, does not need not touch the noun being modified, because it is not essential.

To change the sentence to make the modifier essential you could say, "the letters that were written over this period....."

I hope that makes sense.

• Page 1 of 1