-
gmatmachoman
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
- Thanked: 173 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:710
plz help me
- Attachments
-
Awesome Stuff!!hardik.jadeja wrote:The part of the sentence after the semicolon is supposed to be an independent clause.
The head of the committee, to whom were submitted X, Y and Z, had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal.
The underlined part is a modifier and so it is disposable. We can right the above sentence as
A) The head of the committee had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal. - Correct
The sentence looks grammatically okay.
Lets remove the disposable modifier and check all the options similarly.
B) The head of the committee and it had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal. - Incorrect
C) The head of the committee and had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal. - Incorrect
D) The head of the committee had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal. - Correct
E) The head of the committee and had the power to approve or cancel all the proposal. - Incorrect
Lets check A and D now. We will have to check modifier of both the sentences.
Option D has subject verb agreement issue in the modifier. Subject is "A model, a drawing and a description of every project", which is plural. So we need were.
so pick A.
Hope that helps..
Subject of the main clause is The head of the committee. But in the modifier, the subject is "A model, a drawing and a description of every project".ashish2104 wrote:One question here,
The head of the committee is singular, hence should use singular verb like was rather than were.
Though I agree that option D is awkward, Can somebody clear my doubt?