Hey anju,
No problem. Actually I tried re-reading your question as well as your explaination.
I understand the general statement but I don't understand how one can use this example to explain that vs which:
According to you,
which should refer to a specific noun in the preceding clause. - I agree
That noun does not exist ( Rise of sales) . So, it is replaced by an amount that is 14 percent higher … ----- I do not agree
Reason is:
My explaination - from what I understand , the sentence doesn't convey that "which" should correspond to "Rise in Sales". Instead it corresponds to the final number that the Sales rose to . However, the construction of the sentence is ambiguous... since we cannot make out what "which" is referring to. To add that clarity in the sentence, we need to use a specific noun and that is "amount".
Now, according to what you said in theory, if we added a noun "amount", we could use "that"/"which" interchangeably??
So the corrected sentence could be either
1) Sales of United States manufactured goods to non-industrialized countries rose to $167 billion in 1992,
an amount which is 14 percent more than the previous year and largely offsets weak demand from Europe and Japan.
2) Sales of United States manufactured goods to non-industrialized countries rose to $167 billion in 1992,
an amount that is 14 percent more than the previous year's figure and largely offsets weak demand from Europe and Japan.
Anju, i'll wait for another 2 examples of yours which clearly show the usage of "that vs which". Because I am confused here
I am wondering if this example has anything to do with differentiating the usage of that versus which and instead a simple pronoun reference problem.
Please correct me if i am wrong!