BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

please please please... help me with these concepts

Expert replies
by abhishek07sep » Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:40 pm
1. Abhishek goes to the market, and then returns home...
isn't this sentence a run on?
2. Abhsihek went to the market,but will not go to the temple...
isn't this sentence a run on too?
3. If x,y,z are parallel elements..
Allen wants x,modifier of x,y, and z.
Is the above formation correct?
4. A letter by mark twain, written in 1200, reveals........... . . . . . . . .
"by mark twain" is it a "MISSION CRITICAL MODIFIER"
IF NOT HOW COME THIS STRUCTURE IS CORRECT? modifier "written .....1200" doesn't touch its noun "letter"
5. Presenters at exhibition, one of whom is blind, will demonstrate how to use computers....
here again "one of whom is blind", is it is a sub group modifier??? if yes why isn't it touching its noun "presenters"
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:31 am
This is my answer to a similar question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/run-on-seten ... tml#482890
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:The first two sentences you have posted are correctly connected:

I adopted two dogs, which weigh approximately 100 pounds each. - There is a comma and the pronoun "which." Thus the sentence is properly formed.

The second sentence "I adopted two dogs, each of which weighs approximately 100 pounds." is also correct for the same reason.

A run-on sentence is a sentence in which two or more independent clauses (i.e., complete sentences) are joined without appropriate punctuation or conjunction. This is the case in the next sentences:
I adopted two dogs, they weigh approximately 100 pounds each.
Only a comma separates these two independent clauses from each other and there is no logical connection between them. These two clauses could easily make two separate sentences.

The same is true about the other two sentences.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by abhishek07sep » Mon Jul 16, 2012 2:25 am
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:This is my answer to a similar question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/run-on-seten ... tml#482890
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:The first two sentences you have posted are correctly connected:

I adopted two dogs, which weigh approximately 100 pounds each. - There is a comma and the pronoun "which." Thus the sentence is properly formed.

The second sentence "I adopted two dogs, each of which weighs approximately 100 pounds." is also correct for the same reason.

A run-on sentence is a sentence in which two or more independent clauses (i.e., complete sentences) are joined without appropriate punctuation or conjunction. This is the case in the next sentences:
I adopted two dogs, they weigh approximately 100 pounds each.
Only a comma separates these two independent clauses from each other and there is no logical connection between them. These two clauses could easily make two separate sentences.

The same is true about the other two sentences.
i still didn't get whether my 1st two statements are correct or not.....

and i would be very grateful if you could help me with the other 3 doubts as well
Join the discussion

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:40 am
As to the first two sentences, they are not run-ons, because they contain the conjunctions "and" and "but."
I am not sure what you were trying to say in the third sentence...Could you please rephrase it?

Sentence 4 is correct.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:27 am
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:As to the first two sentences, they are not run-ons, because they contain the conjunctions "and" and "but."
Hi Kasia

But sentence 1 ans 2 also contain a comma before AND and BUT ; which expect a independant clause to be on both the sides.
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

by abhishek07sep » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:49 am
shekhar.kataria wrote:
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:As to the first two sentences, they are not run-ons, because they contain the conjunctions "and" and "but."
Hi Kasia

But sentence 1 ans 2 also contain a comma before AND and BUT ; which expect a independant clause to be on both the sides.
i like apples and mangoes.
above sentence is correct

but
i like apples,and mangoes..
above sentence is incorrect...


HELP PLEASE
Join the discussion