BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

FUNBOYS! - sentence structure

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:58 pm

FUNBOYS! - sentence structure

by MICHAELIU » Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:59 pm
Hi Guys,

1, Recently I learned a new concept regarding to the sentence structure: using FUNBOYS (FOR, UNTILL, NOR, BUT, OR, YET, SINCE) as a connector for two clauses, but I m a bit confused about this example below saying that:

If a comma NOT used between the two clauses, its wrong:

I m late for school, for the traffic jam was too bad this morning. Wrong
I m late for school for the traffic jam was too bad this morning. Right

2, Unlike John, whose parents are out of town and his grandparents are staying with him, Jake lives with both his parents and his grandparents.

Question: Can the clause of "whose...are...." and clause of "his....are...."be connected with "and"?

Many thanks!
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:52 pm
Thanked: 53 times
Followed by:21 members

by David@GMATPrepNow » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:18 am
Hi Michaeliu,

The short answer is sure, you can use the conjunction "and" to connect those two parts of the sentence.

The longer answer is that your example breaks the rule of parallelism, by which I mean that "whose parents are out of town and his grandparents are staying with him" is incorrect in its construction. "Whose parents..." needs "and whose grandparents" to show correct parallel structure.

Good on your for discovering FUNBOYS. Those little conjunctions are used to connect two independent clauses. I would not go so far as to say it is INCORRECT to use a comma when joining two independent clauses, at least not always.

Be careful to use a comma when a little conjunction joins two independent clauses, UNLESS the conjunction is - as in your example - a subordinating conjunction. Let's look at your example with the word "because" in the place of "for," to make it obvious:

I'm late for school because the traffic jam was so bad this morning. CORRECT. NO COMMA.

In this example, "because" is a subordinating conjunction and you do not need a comma. In fact, adding a comma would be incorrect.

But let's look at a different example with two independent clauses:

I'm late for school this morning, and I did not have a chance to eat breakfast.

You might argue that, stylistically, it is simpler to omit the comma, and you would be correct. But, grammatically, it is correct to use a comma when joining independent clauses. It is very necessary to use commas when joining more than two independent clauses. Here is an example:

I'm late for school this morning, my hair is a complete mess, and I did not have a chance to eat breakfast.

You can see that the three independent clauses need to be separated by commas, and the final independent clause needs the little conjunction "and."

My point is to be careful which conjunction you apply the "no comma" rule to.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1