BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

FUNBOYS! - sentence structure

Expert replies
by MICHAELIU » Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:59 pm
Hi Guys,

1, Recently I learned a new concept regarding to the sentence structure: using FUNBOYS (FOR, UNTILL, NOR, BUT, OR, YET, SINCE) as a connector for two clauses, but I m a bit confused about this example below saying that:

If a comma NOT used between the two clauses, its wrong:

I m late for school, for the traffic jam was too bad this morning. Wrong
I m late for school for the traffic jam was too bad this morning. Right

2, Unlike John, whose parents are out of town and his grandparents are staying with him, Jake lives with both his parents and his grandparents.

Question: Can the clause of "whose...are...." and clause of "his....are...."be connected with "and"?

Many thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by David@GMATPrepNow » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:18 am
Hi Michaeliu,

The short answer is sure, you can use the conjunction "and" to connect those two parts of the sentence.

The longer answer is that your example breaks the rule of parallelism, by which I mean that "whose parents are out of town and his grandparents are staying with him" is incorrect in its construction. "Whose parents..." needs "and whose grandparents" to show correct parallel structure.

Good on your for discovering FUNBOYS. Those little conjunctions are used to connect two independent clauses. I would not go so far as to say it is INCORRECT to use a comma when joining two independent clauses, at least not always.

Be careful to use a comma when a little conjunction joins two independent clauses, UNLESS the conjunction is - as in your example - a subordinating conjunction. Let's look at your example with the word "because" in the place of "for," to make it obvious:

I'm late for school because the traffic jam was so bad this morning. CORRECT. NO COMMA.

In this example, "because" is a subordinating conjunction and you do not need a comma. In fact, adding a comma would be incorrect.

But let's look at a different example with two independent clauses:

I'm late for school this morning, and I did not have a chance to eat breakfast.

You might argue that, stylistically, it is simpler to omit the comma, and you would be correct. But, grammatically, it is correct to use a comma when joining independent clauses. It is very necessary to use commas when joining more than two independent clauses. Here is an example:

I'm late for school this morning, my hair is a complete mess, and I did not have a chance to eat breakfast.

You can see that the three independent clauses need to be separated by commas, and the final independent clause needs the little conjunction "and."

My point is to be careful which conjunction you apply the "no comma" rule to.
Join the discussion