Hi parveen110,
Don't worry about this question. It's written in something of an ambiguous fashion. Since the prompt refers to the cost of painting the "outer surface", it stands to reason that the "bottom" of the box should also be painted (but apparently the solution doesn't include it). The question also states that the box is made of wood that is 2cm thick; the proper visualization would be to add 2cm to each of the dimensions TWICE (but the solution doesn't do that either; it assumes that the "outside height" and the "inside height" of the box are the same).
GMAT writers create (and vet) questions to a significant degree; the test would not include an active question (that counted) that was written in this fashion. It is possible that this might, in some rare set of circumstances, show up as an experimental question, but I'll bet that you'll never see anything written in this odd style on your GMAT. You'll be tested on the basic geometry formulas behind this question though.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich