I can't seem to escape the high 30s and I'm thinking it comes down to a certain understanding that just has not come to me. I'm hoping I can get someone who has scored in the mid to high 40s to look at this sentence correction question to describe what he is thinking on these questions so that I can divine some understanding for myself. When I make mistakes on sentence correction the wrong answer is usually wrong because of it is awkwardly stated. I have no idea how to recognize awkwardly stated answers. Here are some examples of what continuously baffles me:
Because the management of a large corporation is will often refer to macroeconomic forecasts when it plans for the future, it is probable that its belief in their soundness is significant.
1)
2) it is probable that the soundness of their belief would be significant.
3) believing their soundness is probably not significant.
4) the significance of their belief in its soundness is probable.
5) its belief in their soundness is probably significant.
What is the answer and why? Thanks in advance.
While I'm at it here's another example of the ambiguous answers that I just can't seem to grasp. Please tell me what you see is wrong with these sentences:
During the 18th Century roughly 0.5 billion grams of gold are estimated to have left Columbia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, and Haiti and supplied 80% of the world's total quantity of recovered gold.
and one of the answer choices:
Roughly 0.5 billion grams of gold is estimated as having left Columbia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, and Haiti, supplying
Again, thanks in advance.
Because the management of a large corporation is will often refer to macroeconomic forecasts when it plans for the future, it is probable that its belief in their soundness is significant.
1)
2) it is probable that the soundness of their belief would be significant.
3) believing their soundness is probably not significant.
4) the significance of their belief in its soundness is probable.
5) its belief in their soundness is probably significant.
What is the answer and why? Thanks in advance.
While I'm at it here's another example of the ambiguous answers that I just can't seem to grasp. Please tell me what you see is wrong with these sentences:
During the 18th Century roughly 0.5 billion grams of gold are estimated to have left Columbia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, and Haiti and supplied 80% of the world's total quantity of recovered gold.
and one of the answer choices:
Roughly 0.5 billion grams of gold is estimated as having left Columbia, Peru, Ecuador, Panama, and Haiti, supplying
Again, thanks in advance.












