IMO - B
Statement 1
Take x= 11 , y=6
x> y+4
However it does not satisfy x> (7/3)y
Take x= 1000 , y=1
x> y+4 And the condition x> (7/3)y is satisfied
Hence statement 1 is not sufficient
Statement 2
-5x < -14y
Mutiplying both sides by -1 , the sign of the eqn also changes
we get 5x > 14y
x> (14/5)y
Hence x> (7/3)y , the main condition is satisfied.
Hence B
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
3x
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Yes I did the same thing and my answer was B but the OA is C
I do doubt the OA. I would wait for some more explanations.
I do doubt the OA. I would wait for some more explanations.
Answer should be - B
Statement 1 -
x = 10, y = 4
10 > 5 + 4 but 10 < 2.33 * 5
x = 6, y = 1
6 > 1 + 4 and 6 > 2.33 * 1
Insufficient
Statement 2 -
-5x < - 14y = multiply by -1
5x > 14y -> x > 14/5 * y
x > 2.8y therefore x will always be greater than 2.33 y
Statement 1 -
x = 10, y = 4
10 > 5 + 4 but 10 < 2.33 * 5
x = 6, y = 1
6 > 1 + 4 and 6 > 2.33 * 1
Insufficient
Statement 2 -
-5x < - 14y = multiply by -1
5x > 14y -> x > 14/5 * y
x > 2.8y therefore x will always be greater than 2.33 y
Looking only at S2, we have:
-5x < -14y
5x > 14y
3x > (3/5)*14y
3x > 8.4y
So we know that 3x > 8.4y, and we want to know if 3x > 7y. If y is positive, the answer is certainly 'yes', because then 8.4y > 7y. However, if y is negative, 8.4y is less than 7y. We might have:
y = -1
x = -2.5
Then 3x = -7.5 is certainly greater than 8.4y = -8.4, but 3x is not greater than 7y = -7. Statement 2 is not sufficient.
-5x < -14y
5x > 14y
3x > (3/5)*14y
3x > 8.4y
So we know that 3x > 8.4y, and we want to know if 3x > 7y. If y is positive, the answer is certainly 'yes', because then 8.4y > 7y. However, if y is negative, 8.4y is less than 7y. We might have:
y = -1
x = -2.5
Then 3x = -7.5 is certainly greater than 8.4y = -8.4, but 3x is not greater than 7y = -7. Statement 2 is not sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
Hi Ian. The main statement says that x and y are positive. In such a situation the ans would be B right ?Ian Stewart wrote:Looking only at S2, we have:
-5x < -14y
5x > 14y
3x > (3/5)*14y
3x > 8.4y
So we know that 3x > 8.4y, and we want to know if 3x > 7y. If y is positive, the answer is certainly 'yes', because then 8.4y > 7y. However, if y is negative, 8.4y is less than 7y. We might have:
y = -1
x = -2.5
Then 3x = -7.5 is certainly greater than 8.4y = -8.4, but 3x is not greater than 7y = -7. Statement 2 is not sufficient.
Good point! When I was writing up my answer, I think I was remembering a different question that didn't have that restriction. Yes, since:raghavsarathy wrote:
Hi Ian. The main statement says that x and y are positive. In such a situation the ans would be B right ?
8.4 > 7
then if y is positive, we can multiply on both sides by y without reversing the inequality to get:
8.4y > 7y
so if x > 8.4y, then x certainly must be greater than 7y. So to clarify my post above, if x and y are positive, S2 is certainly sufficient. If you remove that condition from the question, then S2 is not sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
















