DS-Prob 1

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:29 pm
What is the remainder of a positive integer N when it is divided by 2?

1. N contains odd numbers as factors
2. N is a multiple of 15

Stmt 1. Integers with odd factors include such numbers as 6 and 9. Both 6 ( 2 * 3 ) and 9 ( 3 * 3 ), in which case 6/2 has no remainder while 9/2 has a reminader of 1. So Insuff.

Stmt 2. Multiples of 15 are 15, 30, 45 etc . Thus ,15/2 has 1 as a remainder, 30/2 has as a 0 remainder. So Insuff.

Merging the stmts will similarly yield varied remainders. So Insuff. Thus E.

If, however, stmt 1 stated that N has odd number of factors, the answer would be C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:27 am
Thanked: 3 times

by boazkhan » Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:48 pm
If I am interpreting the first statement correctly -- Odd numbers as factors. In that case IMO A.


What is the OA?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:07 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 447 times
Followed by:88 members

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:11 pm
(1) If an odd integer when divided by 2 will always leave 1 as the remainder.
An even integer leaves a remainder 0 when divided by 2. We have no information whether N is even or odd.
So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) Multiples of 15 are 15, 30, 45... Here 15 is odd, 30 is even, so 15 leaves remainder of 1 and 30 leaves a remainder 0.
So, (2) is also NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2) also, we don't whether N is even or odd. So it is also NOT SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is (E).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:50 pm
@Rahul
the option1 says it as factors as odd numbers as factors (3,5,7 etc)
in any case the prodcut of odd no is odd and the remainder shd be 1 when divided by 2

hence OA should be A


Please advise


@Haaress
6 does not have odd factors. 2 is not considered as a odd no
Rahul@gurome wrote:(1) If an odd integer when divided by 2 will always leave 1 as the remainder.
An even integer leaves a remainder 0 when divided by 2. We have no information whether N is even or odd.
So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) Multiples of 15 are 15, 30, 45... Here 15 is odd, 30 is even, so 15 leaves remainder of 1 and 30 leaves a remainder 0.
So, (2) is also NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2) also, we don't whether N is even or odd. So it is also NOT SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is (E).
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:07 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 447 times
Followed by:88 members

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:02 am
outreach wrote:@Rahul
the option1 says it as factors as odd numbers as factors (3,5,7 etc)
in any case the prodcut of odd no is odd and the remainder shd be 1 when divided by 2

hence OA should be A
Please advise
@Haaress
6 does not have odd factors. 2 is not considered as a odd no
N contains odd numbers as factors does not imply for sure that N will only have odd numbers as factors. The case may be as explained below:

If N = 36, then N = 2*2*3*3; here N does contain odd numbers as factors, but when N is divided by 2 the remainder = 0.
If N = 27, then N = 3*3*3; here N contains only odd numbers as factors and when N is divided by 2, the remainder = 1.

I hope that helps?
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:07 am
outreach wrote:
@Haaress
6 does not have odd factors. 2 is not considered as a odd no

The stmt states that N contains odd numbers as factors, meaning that a integer such as 6 has factor, 1, 2, 3, and 6. So 3 is an odd factor in 6.

Hope that helps!

Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:41 am
the answer should be E
(1) from 1 st we are given that N is square of the integer, as only square of the integer has odd number of factors
so remainder can be 0 or 1
1=2*0+1
4=2*2+0
9=2*4+1....
so insufficient
(2) from 2 st we are given that N is a multiple of 15
15=2*7+1
30=2*15+0
also insufficient
both:N is a square of the integer and multiple of 15
so it can be
15^2=2*a+1. or
15^2*2^2=2*b+0
so as we have 1, or 0 as remainders the answer is E

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:29 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by anirban_lax » Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:00 pm
clock60 wrote: (1) from 1 st we are given that N is square of the integer, as only square of the integer has odd number of factors
so remainder can be 0 or 1
1=2*0+1
4=2*2+0
9=2*4+1....
I think the inference you are using is not correct. N cannot surely be concluded as a square number just because it has odd number of factors. In that case 15 (1*3*5) should be a square number.
A possible inference that can be drawn is that N is surely not a prime number. But, that doesn't help us much.

Also, the actual question posted doesn't say that the number of factors is odd - it simply says that it has factor(s) that are odd number(s).

Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:32 pm
anirban_lax wrote:
clock60 wrote: (1) from 1 st we are given that N is square of the integer, as only square of the integer has odd number of factors
so remainder can be 0 or 1
1=2*0+1
4=2*2+0
9=2*4+1....
I think the inference you are using is not correct. N cannot surely be concluded as a square number just because it has odd number of factors. In that case 15 (1*3*5) should be a square number.
A possible inference that can be drawn is that N is surely not a prime number. But, that doesn't help us much.

Also, the actual question posted doesn't say that the number of factors is odd - it simply says that it has factor(s) that are odd number(s).
hi friend
am not strong in math, but in your example-15 has even number of factors
1,3,5,15
as second notice i think you are right i misread the question but it is slightly ambiguous
if n contains only odd numbers as factors the answer should be A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:07 am
Thanked: 9 times

by aloneontheedge » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:03 pm
1.What is the remainder of a positive integer N when it is divided by 2?
1> N contains odd numbers as factors
2>N is a multiple of 15

IMO A :
Stmtn 1 says : N contains odd numbers as factors (Not odd number of factors) in that case the remainder is always 1.

square of a integer contains odd factors,but not odd numbers

ex 2^2 = 4 (factors 1,2,4) which are not odd
3^2 = 9 (factors 1,3,9) which are odd and remainder is 1