BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

exponents

Expert replies
by resilient » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:58 pm
2+2+2^2+2^3+2^4+2^5+2^6+2^7+2^8+2^9+2^10=

1. 2^10
2. 2^11
3. 2^18
4. 2^54
5. 2^56


oa is b? what is the shortest way to do this?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Neo2000 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 12:05 am
2^n + 2^n = 2(2^n) = 2^(n+1)

Once you know this, you will realise that your answer is [spoiler]2^11[/spoiler]

p.s. 250 posts!!! :D
Join the discussion

by cjiang16 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:49 pm
Using estimation, the answer is B.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Apr 12, 2008 7:20 pm
cjiang16 wrote:Using estimation, the answer is B.
Elimination/estimation is a great method for this question.
1. 2^10
2. 2^11
3. 2^18
4. 2^54
5. 2^56
Well, we know that 2^10 is just one of the bits, so eliminate (1).

We also know that we're adding 11 different terms.

Even if EVERY ONE were 2^10, that would give us 11*(2^10) or approximately 2*2*3*(2^10)

Well, 2*2*3*(2^10) would be somewhere between 2^13 and 2^14. So, choices (3), (4) and (5) are all WAY too big.

Only (2) is left!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Re: exponents

by manju_ej » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:23 am
resilient wrote:2+2+2^2+2^3+2^4+2^5+2^6+2^7+2^8+2^9+2^10=

1. 2^10
2. 2^11
3. 2^18
4. 2^54
5. 2^56


The answer is 2^11
Remove the first term (2) and take a look at the remaining portions. They are in the Geometric Progression.
So the formula to find the sum of n terms of a geometric progression is S=b1*(1-r^n/1-r), where b1 is the first term, r is the ratio between the two variables, in this case r=2 (ie, third term divided by second term)
By using this formula, I got S=2046.
Now add the term '2' we removed to this figure(s=2046) which gives you 2048.
We know 2^10 is 1024 so 2^10*2=2048.
So the answer is 2^10*2^1 ,which is equal to 2^11, option B.
Join the discussion

by sudhir3127 » Mon Jul 21, 2008 8:53 am
i wud use goemetric mean to solve the problem..
Join the discussion

by reachac » Mon Jul 21, 2008 9:47 am
I'd rather use sum of GP to solve.
Join the discussion