BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A different approach on a triangle problem.

Expert replies
by OneTwoThreeFour » Sun May 29, 2011 11:46 am
Compare these two questions for a moment:

2. How many triangles with positive area can be drawn on the coordinate plane such that the vertices have integer coordinates (x,y) satisfying 1≤x≤3 and 1≤y≤3?


(A) 72
(B) 76
(C) 78
(D) 80
(E) 84

Answer: b

1. Right triangle PQR is to be constructed in the xy-plane so that the right angle is at P and PR is parallel to x axis. The x and y coordinated of P,Q & R are to be integers that satisfy the inequalities -4<=x<=5 & 6<=y<=16.
How many different triangles wth these properties are possible?

A. 110
B. 1100
C. 9900
D. 10000
E. 12100

Answer: C

Now my question is, can we use OG's method to solve the first problem on the second one? I know how to solve the second problem using combinatorics, which is the most straightforward and efficient approach. But, I am having a bit of difficulty trying to solve it using OG's way from the first problem. Or, check out Mitch's way at the link:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/how-many-tri ... 13159.html

Image



Solving the second problem using OG's method from the first problem:
A triangle must have 3 points; the first point can have a total of 9 choices. (3x3. Since each point must have an integer value, we can have a total of 9 dots on a xy plane.) The second point can have a total of 8 possibilities, since it cannot be the exact same point as the first one. So far, we have 9x8. So for the third point, we should have 7 possibilities. Therefore the answer should be 9 x 8 x 7 -8= 496. (We subtract 8, since the 3 points cannot be in a line.) Of course, this is wrong since 496 > 76. So why is (9x8x7)-8 wrong? Is there a correct way to solve it using OG's way on the second problem?

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 1:16 pm
A triangle must have 3 points; the first point can have a total of 9 choices. (3x3. Since each point must have an integer value, we can have a total of 9 dots on a xy plane.) The second point can have a total of 8 possibilities, since it cannot be the exact same point as the first one. So far, we have 9x8. So for the third point, we should have 7 possibilities. Therefore the answer should be 9 x 8 x 7 -8= 496. (We subtract 8, since the 3 points cannot be in a line.) Of course, this is wrong since 496 > 76. So why is (9x8x7)-8 wrong? Is there a correct way to solve it using OG's way on the second problem?
9*8*7 is wrong. Suppose first you chose (1,1) and then (1,2) and then (2,1) and form a triangle ABC.
Now in next selection suppose you chose (1,2) first, then (2,1) and then (1,1). The triangle formed will be the same. Hence repetition is there.
You can solve it like this:
Total 9 points, to form a triangle select 3. (Order doesn't matter)
Hence 9C3 = 84
Now subtract 8 (3 points in a lint)
Hence 84-8 = 76.
Join the discussion

by SoCan » Sun May 29, 2011 1:32 pm
Like cans said, order does not matter in question #2.

Whether you pick (1,1), (1,2) and (2,3) or (2,3), (1,1) and (1,2), you have the same triangle. Since there are 6 ways to pick each triangle (3!), you have divide 9*8*7 by 6. Then you subtract your 8 straight line combinations.

Why is this different from the first question? Because there are constraints on that triangle: it is a right triangle, and one of the sides adjacent to that right angle has to be parallel to the the x-axis. This means that order DOES matter, because the coordinates of the 2nd point depend on the coordinates of the 1st point, and the coordinates of the 3rd point depend on the coordinates of the 2nd and 1st point.
Join the discussion

by OneTwoThreeFour » Sun May 29, 2011 1:47 pm
Thank you everyone! I should have taken consideration of the coordinates for each dot on the xy-plane. Thanks for pointing out the overlap, this makes sense now.
Join the discussion

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 1:53 pm
And one suggestion..
While posting 2 questions, its better if you mark them in order.
It got a bit confusing considering first question was Q no. 2 and second question was actually Q no. 1
thanks :)
Join the discussion