Big Bang and Interstellar dust

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:31 am

Big Bang and Interstellar dust

by nravinandan » Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:26 am
Pls discuss the following question:

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

a. persisting
b. persists
c. persisted
d. they persist
e. are persisting
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:39 am
IMO D

A: Lacks parallelism
B:SV Error
C:Wrong tense
E:same as C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by moneyman » Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:50 am
Its a parallelism question..I feel the answer is B

D cannot be the answer because "they" may refer to particles as well as astronomers.

What is the OA?
Maxx

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:05 am
I would say it to be A

Reason as already stated........
B: Subject / verb
particles / comprise / persists

C
means particles persisted in the past
wrong


D
they is wrong

E also wrong bcoz tense

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:34 am
imo: A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Windsor
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:650

by jsl » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:52 am
Wow - a difficult one for such a small underlined sentence.

I would go for A.

I don't think this is a parallelism issue. We have to figure out what persisted here. Either the particles or molecules. I would go for the former.

If persist (singular) were in the list, that would also be an option as that would be parallel with comprise.

OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
Thanked: 16 times

by amitabhprasad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:16 am
I will go with "A" as well.
Confused between "A" and "E"
but I feel use of verb "are" will make 2nd phrase a clause there by not parallel with the 1st phrase.
"C" is wrong for being thing of the past.
"D" use of "they"

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: NY and Boston
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:16 members

by Karen » Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:58 am
It's A.

This problem is clearly based on the "giant fungus in the forest of Michigan" problem in OG-11 (sorry I forget which number that item is; I can look it up later if necessary), and the same solution applies.

The key here is that "persisting" is parallel to "created". In other words, this part of the sentence means the same as "the atoms and molecules that were created in the progenitive explosion and that persist in even the emptiest regions of space."

You may be wondering how an -ed form (a past participle) can be parallel to an -ing (a gerund). Well, even though they don't *look* very similar to each other, they're considered parallel in terms of their grammatical function. They're both adjectives formed from verbs. The -ing form is sometimes even called the "present participle," so you can see the similarity to the "past participle." So in other words, combinations like "recently lost and still missing," "shot and bleeding," or "diversified and growing" are all parallel.

B is wrong because it would have incorrect verb agreement.

C is wrong because it wouldn't be parallel -- C is a past tense form, which superficially *looks* like the past participle "created" but isn't the same kind of grammatical thing. "created" in this sentence is a participle, like "broken" or "thrown," not a past tense verb.

D is wrong because the subject 'they' makes this clause not parallel to anything else in the sentence. It can't be parallel to "that comprise the atoms and molecules... etc." (think of it this way -- could you say 'particles tha comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and _that_ they persist..."??) And "they persist" is clearly not parallel to "created" either.

E "are persisting" is awkward and a strange choice of verb tense -- "are persisting" uses present progressive tense, which is used for temporary situations, things that are going on right around now but not for too much longer. It makes it sound like these particles are just hanging around for a little while -- the opposite of what the sentence is saying.
Karen van Hoek, PhD
Verbal Specialist

Test Prep New York
maximize your score, minimize your stress
www.testprepny.com
[email protected]

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Similar to Q 39 OG 11

by iamcste » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:35 pm
Similar to Q 39 OG 11

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:18 pm
Karen wrote:It's A.

This problem is clearly based on the "giant fungus in the forest of Michigan" problem in OG-11 (sorry I forget which number that item is; I can look it up later if necessary), and the same solution applies.

The key here is that "persisting" is parallel to "created". In other words, this part of the sentence means the same as "the atoms and molecules that were created in the progenitive explosion and that persist in even the emptiest regions of space."

You may be wondering how an -ed form (a past participle) can be parallel to an -ing (a gerund). Well, even though they don't *look* very similar to each other, they're considered parallel in terms of their grammatical function. They're both adjectives formed from verbs. The -ing form is sometimes even called the "present participle," so you can see the similarity to the "past participle." So in other words, combinations like "recently lost and still missing," "shot and bleeding," or "diversified and growing" are all parallel.

B is wrong because it would have incorrect verb agreement.

C is wrong because it wouldn't be parallel -- C is a past tense form, which superficially *looks* like the past participle "created" but isn't the same kind of grammatical thing. "created" in this sentence is a participle, like "broken" or "thrown," not a past tense verb.

D is wrong because the subject 'they' makes this clause not parallel to anything else in the sentence. It can't be parallel to "that comprise the atoms and molecules... etc." (think of it this way -- could you say 'particles tha comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and _that_ they persist..."??) And "they persist" is clearly not parallel to "created" either.

E "are persisting" is awkward and a strange choice of verb tense -- "are persisting" uses present progressive tense, which is used for temporary situations, things that are going on right around now but not for too much longer. It makes it sound like these particles are just hanging around for a little while -- the opposite of what the sentence is saying.
I love you Karen! :)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:46 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by sam98034 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:01 pm
Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

My guess is that you're making this too complicated. Particles is implied a second time in the sentence but is removed.

"...particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [particles] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space."

In English we don't need to add the second one.
People live and learn...people live and [people] learn. I would remove the junk and shorten this whole thing in my head to a definition:

Interstellar dust: Particles created and [particles] persisting in space.
you wouldn't say:
Particles created and [persists, persisted, they persist, are persisting] in space.

Am I right?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:31 am

by nravinandan » Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:01 am
Wow!! what a good discussion. Isnt it a tricky question. Yes, its very similar to Q39 OG11.

OA: A

As already pointed out this sentence has the participles "created" and "persisting" in parallel. Atoms and molecules created in .... and (Atoms and molecules) persisting in ....

The present participle "persisting" parallels the past participle "created". "created" refers to something that happened in the past, while "persisting" refers to something that continues into the present.


Other options are wrong (As posted by Karen below)

If we had an option "persist" would it be the right option??
Well... it matches with the subject "Atoms and molecules"... but

"persist" is a present tense verb, not the participle (persisting) needed for the parallel structure.

Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times

by vivek.kapoor83 » Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:11 am
Karen
Thanks for the help.can u expolre the parallelism a bit more...i couldnt get it completely. Or if some1 has got it...pls explain a bit./

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:18 am
Karen wrote:It's A.

This problem is clearly based on the "giant fungus in the forest of Michigan" problem in OG-11 (sorry I forget which number that item is; I can look it up later if necessary), and the same solution applies.

The key here is that "persisting" is parallel to "created". In other words, this part of the sentence means the same as "the atoms and molecules that were created in the progenitive explosion and that persist in even the emptiest regions of space."

You may be wondering how an -ed form (a past participle) can be parallel to an -ing (a gerund). Well, even though they don't *look* very similar to each other, they're considered parallel in terms of their grammatical function. They're both adjectives formed from verbs. The -ing form is sometimes even called the "present participle," so you can see the similarity to the "past participle." So in other words, combinations like "recently lost and still missing," "shot and bleeding," or "diversified and growing" are all parallel.

B is wrong because it would have incorrect verb agreement.

C is wrong because it wouldn't be parallel -- C is a past tense form, which superficially *looks* like the past participle "created" but isn't the same kind of grammatical thing. "created" in this sentence is a participle, like "broken" or "thrown," not a past tense verb.

D is wrong because the subject 'they' makes this clause not parallel to anything else in the sentence. It can't be parallel to "that comprise the atoms and molecules... etc." (think of it this way -- could you say 'particles tha comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and _that_ they persist..."??) And "they persist" is clearly not parallel to "created" either.

E "are persisting" is awkward and a strange choice of verb tense -- "are persisting" uses present progressive tense, which is used for temporary situations, things that are going on right around now but not for too much longer. It makes it sound like these particles are just hanging around for a little while -- the opposite of what the sentence is saying.
What an awesome explanation!!!! ...I love you too Karen :-)

• Page 1 of 1