BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Resolve the paradox - LSAT

Expert replies
by tetura84 » Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:36 pm
The average level of fat in the blood of people suffering from acute cases of disease W is lower than the average level for the population as a whole. Nevertheless, most doctors believe that reducing blood-fat levels is an effective way of preventing acute W.
Which one of the following, if true, does most to justify this apparently paradoxical belief?
(A) The blood level of fat for patients who have been cured of W is on average the same as that for the population at large.
(B) Several of the symptoms characteristic of acute W have been produced in laboratory animals fed large doses of a synthetic fat substitute, though acute W itself has not been produced in this way.
(C) The progression from latent to acute W can occur only when the agent that causes acute W absorbs large quantities of fat from the patient's blood.
(D) The levels of fat in the blood of patients who have disease W respond abnormally slowly to changes in dietary intake of fat.
(E) High levels of fat in the blood are indicative of several diseases that are just as serious as W.

C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by prachich1987 » Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:07 pm
Nice question :)

1) The average level of fat in the blood of people suffering from acute cases of disease W is lower than the average level for the population as a whole.
2) Nevertheless, most doctors believe that reducing blood-fat levels is an effective way of preventing acute W.


(C) The progression from latent to acute W can occur only when the agent that causes acute W absorbs large quantities of fat from the patient's blood.

It explains why the fat content in the blood of patients diagnosed with acute W are lower than the average level of the population as whole.
If the agent that causes acute W absorbs the fat in the blood..then obviously the level of fat in the blood will be lower in such patients.
Thanks!
Prachi
Join the discussion

by Ravish » Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:01 pm
Let's rephrase this question into a simpler one:

Even though patients suffering from acute cases of disease W have been observed to have lower levels of fat as compared to the average population, doctors believe that reducing one's blood-fat level is an effective way of preventing acute cases of disease W

What answer choice would best help resolve the paradox?

An answer choice pointing out that high levels of fat may be responsible for acute cases of disease W.

Looking at the answer choices:

A) Says nothing about why one should lower one's blood fat level to prevent acute cases of disease W

B) A tempting answer choice IF not read thoroughly. The answer choice states that SYMPTOMS were able to be produced in rats but NOT the acute case of the disease

D) States that it may be a tedious task for people to reduce their blood fat level but does not mention anything about the disease

E) Out of scope. We are concerned with how high levels of fat increase the risk of acute W, not that of other diseases

C) Bingo. The reason that the patients with acute W had low blood fat levels was because the agent that causes acute W absorbed their previously higher blood fat levels to progress to an acute case of the disease. The doctors recommended that one should lower his or her blood fat levels because,having low blood fat levels gives the agent causing the disease less opportunity to progress to an acute state as there is less far for it to absorb.


One point that I would like to call out is that , we are concerned with ACUTE cases of the disease and not any milder form. Answer C might confuse some people who may miss out on the word Acute as that may lead them to think that the person already has the disease and hence choice C is irrelevant.
Organizer 'The GMAT and MBA bay area meetup group'

Looking for a study group in the bay area? Join us at https://www.meetup.com/gmat-32/
Join the discussion