" as a means of" vs. "as a means to"

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:4 members

by sakurle » Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:28 am
IMO as a means of is applicable for "noun" whereas as a means to is applicable for a verb. For example: He chops wood as a means of earning his livelihood. Whereas: He chops wood as a means to earn his livelihood.

If anyone has any other ideas please publish.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:41 am

by russianprincess » Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:22 am
"More and more in recent years, cities are stressing the arts as a means to greater economic development".

In this sentence "as a means to" refers to the greater economic development but not to the verb

It still doesn't make sense to me.

• Page 1 of 1