In a political system with only two major parties

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:710
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.

(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.

(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.

(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
Thanks
Airan
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 438
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
Thanked: 26 times

by chidcguy » Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:33 am
On POE B

A) is wrong because it says 3rd party will get voters from both parties. our stimulus says other wise

C) out of scope as we are talking about group who has never voted for either two parties. we are interested about voters who have voted for one of them

D) Its not about the political stance of the 3rd party or how radical it is

E) It is not about the 3rd party founders as well.

B) says "if" before the 3rd party comes into picture and voters are equally divided, neither party will be able to get more than half of the vote.

This to me is inline with what is in the stimuli. 3rd party vote is the one that sways the election in favor of one party

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by loki.gmat » Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:43 am
IMO B.


Thanks!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 12:16 am
Don't have much explanation for it, B seems good.