Nice question. What's the source?josh80 wrote:If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
1) m < p
2) m < 0
Target question: Is v > 0
Given: mv < pv < 0
Statement 1: m < p
IMPORTANT: Notice what happens if we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v.
The resulting inequality will depend on whether v is positive or negative. So, let's consider two cases:
case a: v is NEGATIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m > p
We changed the direction of the inequality sign since we divided by a NEGATIVE value.
case b: v is POSITIVE.
When we take mv < pv and divide both sides by v, we get m < p
The direction of the inequality sign stayed the same since we divided by a POSITIVE value.
Statement 1 tells us that m < p, which means we can rule out case a.
So, we conclude that v is POSITIVE
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: m < 0
We're told that mv < pv < 0, which means that mv < 0
In other words, the product mv is NEGATIVE
Statement 2 tell us that m is NEGATIVE
In order for the product mv to be NEGATIVE, v must be positive
In other words, v > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
