BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Patents

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sun Dec 06, 2009 3:22 am
The current move to patent computer programs is a move in the wrong direction and should be stopped. The patent system was originally designed solely to protect small-time inventors from exploitation. not to give large corporations control over a methodology. Any computer program is merely the implementation of a methodology.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Computer programs should be developed not only by large corporations but by small-time inventors as well.
(B) Implementing a methodology always requires less creative effort than does true invention
(C) The issue of whether or not to patent computer programs presents the patent system with problems that have never before arisen
(D) Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies
(E) Small-time inventors who support the move to patent computer programs act contrary to their own best interests


OA: After discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:21 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:24 am
would go for D. others seem to be out of scope
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:44 pm
Definitely choice D.

His conclusion is that we shouldn't allow corporations to patent computer programs.

His evidence is (1) that the patent system was originally designed to protect (small-time) inventors not to protect corporations' control over methodology, and (2) computer programs are implementations of methodologies (ie, they are not inventions).

Choice D reads: Large corporations should not hold patents for implementations of methodologies.

Does his argument depend on choice D?

Let's see if his argument survives the removal or denial of choice D:

Choice D denied: Large corporations SHOULD hold patents for implementations of methodologies.

So, when we deny choice D, what happens to the argument? Clearly, his argument (that corporations should not allow to patent computer programs because computer programs are implementations of methodologies) falls apart.

Because the argument disintegrates in the absence of choice D, the argument's logical existence depends on choice D.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:35 pm
D seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion