Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

ratio

Expert replies

by cramya » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:42 pm
so A:B is 3:1 that's cool but is there anything like A:B -3:1 ?
Not sure; lets ask around...

If I come across something I will be sure to pass it along also
Join the discussion

by Fab » Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:32 pm
I think it's E either, M has two different values.
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:45 pm
Logitech Please check if this works for you

m^2= 7/5

m^2/n= 7/5 => n=1


m/n^2 = SQRT(m^2/n^4)
=SQRT(7/5/1)
=SQRT(7/5)

So C
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:12 pm
Tryingmybest wrote:Logitech Please check if this works for you

m^2= 7/5

m^2/n= 7/5 => n=1


m/n^2 = SQRT(m^2/n^4)
=SQRT(7/5/1)
=SQRT(7/5)

So C
I don't have any problem with finding the ratio. I am concerned with the two different values of the same ratio:

SQRT(7/5) and - SQRT(7/5)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:19 pm
Please help me understand y do we need - SQRT(7/5)

Could you please spot the logic error in my approach? It will be helpful to analyse.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:34 pm
Tryingmybest wrote:Please help me understand y do we need - SQRT(7/5)

Could you please spot the logic error in my approach? It will be helpful to analyse.

Well you know that every positive number have two square roots. So I guess sqrt(7/5) is samething with -sqrt(7/5)

what is confusing with ratios is, for example -4 and -2

Their ratio is -4/-2 = 2

But does it mean that -4 is 2 times greater than - 2 ? :) NOO

So I am not quite sure about the this negative rules with ratios but, I need some expert opinion.

Just like in beetlejuice, I want to say her name three times:

STACEY STACEY STACEY!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:52 pm
Looks like PM'ng an expert and waiting for a response is the option left

I dont have a convincing answer for you so I am going to wait and watch the explanation unfold for this....
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:58 pm
cramya wrote:Looks like PM'ng an expert and waiting for a response is the option left

I dont have a convincing answer for you so I am going to wait and watch the explanation unfold for this....
In mathematics, a square root of a number x is a number r such that r2 = x, or, in other words, a number r whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself) is x. Every non-negative real number x has a unique non-negative square root, called the principal square root, which is denoted with a radical symbol as \sqrt{x}, or, using exponent notation, as x1/2. For example, the principal square root of 9 is 3, denoted \sqrt{9} = 3, because 32 = 3 × 3 = 9. If otherwise unqualified, "the square root" of a number refers to the principal square root: the square root of 2 is approximately 1.4142.

Every positive number x has two square roots. One of them is \sqrt{x}, which is positive, and the other -\sqrt{x}, which is negative. Together, these two roots are denoted \pm\sqrt{x}. Square roots of negative numbers can be discussed within the framework of complex numbers. More generally, square roots can obviously be considered in any context in which a notion of "squaring" of some mathematical objects is defined (including algebras of matrices, endomorphism rings, etc).

Is 7/5 a real number or non-negative number ? :roll:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:28 am
Ok I believe you can have a negative ratio. I mean the slope of a line is the ratio of the rise and run and you do have negative slopes.

I think a negative ratio of say x/y = -1.8/1 shows the negative correlation of x and y. If y increases by 1, x falls by 1.8.

Btw sqrt(7/5) = 1.8 or -1.8

So a negative ratio is possible.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:52 am
so the answer is E :lol:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:26 am
logitech wrote:so the answer is E :lol:
Logitech,

particularly in ratios, we always take positive ratios.
So, the ans shall be C.
Consider a case: ratio of boys to girls in a class is -4:3? Is it practically feasible? No. Yes, there are negative slopes but we cant apply that concept to ratios. Ratios are always positive numbers.
Hope it clears the air.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:20 am
@jimmiejaz

A slope is a ratio. So if a slope can be negative, then ratios can also be negative.

Ratios are just plain fractions and fractions can be negative.

Declining speed is negative ratio (its called deceleration I guess) since speed is a ratio.

The ratio of boys : girls can't be negative I mean you can't have negative number of boys or girls right.

I believe negative ratios can be theoretically possible, but many cannot be practically possible.

Also a negative ratio shows a negative relationship between the 2 variables. As one variable increases the other decreases. Negative correlation.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:26 am
jimmiejaz wrote:
logitech wrote:so the answer is E :lol:
Logitech,

particularly in ratios, we always take positive ratios.
So, the ans shall be C.
Consider a case: ratio of boys to girls in a class is -4:3? Is it practically feasible? No. Yes, there are negative slopes but we cant apply that concept to ratios. Ratios are always positive numbers.
Hope it clears the air.
jimmie,

how about dollar loosing its value 5 cents per day and euro is climbing up 4 cents per day

What is your ratio ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:27 am
i think we are mixing two concepts here.
Number properties with ratios. Yes the slopes can be related negatively or as you correctly pointed out deceleration but i dont think in gmatland we have anything like negative ratios.
So, we can say out of scope. :)

Would love to hear more on it from an expert though!!!!!!
Experts please help!!!
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:29 am
logitech,

In this case we will consider relative increase decrease....
we can say the total deflection is 9 cents
instead of putting -5:4
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion