BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequality

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:38 am
LulaBrazilia wrote:Is 2x - 3y < x²?

1) 2x - 3y = -2
2) x > 2 and y > 0
Target question: Is 2x - 3y < x²?

Statement 1: 2x - 3y = -2
We can now take the target question, and replace 2x - 3y with -2 to get: Is -2 < x²?
Since x² must be greater than or equal to zero (as with all SQUARED numbers), we can conclude that it MUST be the case that -2 < x²
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > 2 and y > 0
This one is a little trickier.
First recognize that if y > 0, then 3y = some positive value. So, if we take 2x and SUBTRACT 3y, we get a lesser value.
In other words, we can be certain that 2x - 3y < 2x

Now let's compare 2x and x²
If x > 2 (as we're told in statement 2), x² MUST be greater than 2x (test it out if you're not convinced)
In other words, it MUST be the case that 2x < x²
Now that we're derived two inequalities, we can combine them to get 2x - 3y < 2x < x²
From this, we can see that it MUST be the case that 2x - 3y < x²
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:53 am
Statement 1 tells us that the left side of the inequality in the original Q is negative. Since the right side (x^2) must be at least 0, we know that it must be greater than the left side 2x-3y must be less than x^2. we can definitively answer the Q.

Statement 2 is most useful if we manipulate the original question to say: is -3y < x^2 - 2x ?. Since y>0, the left side will be negative. Since x>2, x^2 > 2x and the right side will be positive. So we know for sure that -3 < x^2 - 2x and we can answer the Q definitively.

Each statement is sufficient; the answer is D. The solution below is taken from the GMATFix App.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion