- hutch27
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:25 pm
- Location: NY
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?
(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.
OA is E
I got this right but by plugging in numbers. I watched a video of this problem and saw the more algebraic approach but i'm a little confused about it, particularly how to be confident on what i'm doing is right. I'm also wondering if the writers of this question are star wars fans lol
d1=30+d2
r1=30+r2
30+d2/30+r2 > d2/r2 <--- thats what u get by combining both statements using algebra. had i done it that way i would have probably picked C
30d2+r2d2> 30r2+r2d2
cancel out r2d2
divide by 30
d2>r2 insufficient
how would one reconidze that 30+d2/30+r2 is not greater than d2/r2 Thats where i got confused
(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.
OA is E
I got this right but by plugging in numbers. I watched a video of this problem and saw the more algebraic approach but i'm a little confused about it, particularly how to be confident on what i'm doing is right. I'm also wondering if the writers of this question are star wars fans lol
d1=30+d2
r1=30+r2
30+d2/30+r2 > d2/r2 <--- thats what u get by combining both statements using algebra. had i done it that way i would have probably picked C
30d2+r2d2> 30r2+r2d2
cancel out r2d2
divide by 30
d2>r2 insufficient
how would one reconidze that 30+d2/30+r2 is not greater than d2/r2 Thats where i got confused












