BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

DS(Number System)

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 2:19 am
Location: Cape Town
Thanked: 6 times
by rintoo22 » Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:16 pm
If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Sol :
factors of 105 : 7,3,5
therefore Statement 1 and Statement 2 individually wont solve the issue.
When we put the 2 conditions together then the resultant number is multiple of 105.
Therefore the answer is C. However in QA then answer given is B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 423
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 86 times

by srcc25anu » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:05 pm
B alone is sufficient.

given X = 2*3k
Y = 2*7k

cond B states Y = multiple of 25
hence y = 5^2 * 2 * 7k
given that x = 2*3k
hence xy = 2^2 * 3 * 5^2 * 7K
105 has the following prime factors: 3,5,7

XY above is divisible by all these factors hence XY is divisible by 105
B is sufficient
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pmFollowed by: 255 members
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:42 pm
Hey rintoo,

One thing you probably overlooked here is something the GMAT does frequently as questions get harder - they "hide" information in plain sight in the question stem. Here the question stem already says:

y is a multiple of 14 (factors of 2 and 7)
x is a multiple of 6 (factors of 2 and 3)

And you need the factors of 105 (3*5*7). You already have 3 and 7 from the question stem - but since our eyes get drawn so quickly to the statements it's easy to overlook that fact.

The lesson: Make sure you take inventory of any "hidden gem" information that you already know from the question stem!
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:53 pm
rintoo22 wrote:If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.
Target question: Is xy a multiple of 105?

Important stuff:
First, If N is a multiple of k, then N is divisible by k.

Second, a lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:
If N is divisible by k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N

Examples:
24 is divisible by 3 <--> 24 = 2x2x2x3
70 is divisible by 5 <--> 70 = 2x5x7
330 is divisible by 6 <--> 330 = 2x3x5x11
56 is divisible by 8 <--> 56 = 2x2x2x7


Since 105 = (3)(5)(7), then we can rewrite the target question as . . .
Rephrased target question: Is there a 3, a 5 and a 7 hiding in the prime factorization of xy?

Given: x is a multiple of 6
In other words, x = (2)(3)(other possible prime numbers)

Given: y is a multiple of 14
In other words,y = (2)(7)(other possible prime numbers)

Combine both of the above to see that xy = (2)(2)(3)(7)(other possible prime numbers)

So, the given information tells us that we ALREADY have a 3 and a 7 hiding in the prime factorization of xy. The only piece missing is the 5.

So, we can rephrase our target question one last time. . .

Rephrased target question: Is there a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy?

Now we can check the statements.

Statement 1: x is a multiple of 9.
Since 9 = (3)(3), all this tells us is that there are two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
So, there may or may not be a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: y is a multiple of 25.
Since 25 = (5)(5), this tells us is that there is definitely a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:25 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: NY
Thanked: 5 times

by hutch27 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:33 am
That is a really good explanation, Brent. I agree that integer property question do have a lot to do with prime numbers. I think the tricky part is rephrasing the target question. I'm going to tackle a few more to practice applying prime factorization techniques.



Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
rintoo22 wrote:If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?
(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.
Target question: Is xy a multiple of 105?

Important stuff:
First, If N is a multiple of k, then N is divisible by k.

Second, a lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization.
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:
If N is divisible by k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N

Examples:
24 is divisible by 3 <--> 24 = 2x2x2x3
70 is divisible by 5 <--> 70 = 2x5x7
330 is divisible by 6 <--> 330 = 2x3x5x11
56 is divisible by 8 <--> 56 = 2x2x2x7


Since 105 = (3)(5)(7), then we can rewrite the target question as . . .
Rephrased target question: Is there a 3, a 5 and a 7 hiding in the prime factorization of xy?

Given: x is a multiple of 6
In other words, x = (2)(3)(other possible prime numbers)

Given: y is a multiple of 14
In other words,y = (2)(7)(other possible prime numbers)

Combine both of the above to see that xy = (2)(2)(3)(7)(other possible prime numbers)

So, the given information tells us that we ALREADY have a 3 and a 7 hiding in the prime factorization of xy. The only piece missing is the 5.

So, we can rephrase our target question one last time. . .

Rephrased target question: Is there a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy?

Now we can check the statements.

Statement 1: x is a multiple of 9.
Since 9 = (3)(3), all this tells us is that there are two 3's hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
So, there may or may not be a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: y is a multiple of 25.
Since 25 = (5)(5), this tells us is that there is definitely a 5 hiding in the prime factorization of xy.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = B

Cheers,
Brent
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1