statement 1:
m+n<0
Here both m and n can be negative and satisfy the above condition..
For example let m=-1 and n=-1
-2<0
Consider a case wherein m and are different but satisfy the above statement
Let m=-2 and n=1
-1<0
Insufficient
statement 2
mn<0
for the above statement to be true any one of the numbers ((either m or n) must be negative.
So this statement clearly indicates that m is not equal to n
Sufficient
The ans is B..Hope this helps
inequalities
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
raju232007
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 2:43 am
- Thanked: 12 times
Here is how I approached stat 1:
Stat 1:
m+n<0
m < -n
Values for m and n:
-2 < -1
-4 < -2
-5 < -4
As you can see none of the above values would allow m to equal n. Hence sufficient. However, there is definitely somethign wrong with my analysis becuase the answer is B. Could you please reivew my working and let me know what I'm doing wrong for statement 1. Thanks!
Stat 1:
m+n<0
m < -n
Values for m and n:
-2 < -1
-4 < -2
-5 < -4
As you can see none of the above values would allow m to equal n. Hence sufficient. However, there is definitely somethign wrong with my analysis becuase the answer is B. Could you please reivew my working and let me know what I'm doing wrong for statement 1. Thanks!
-
Gmatss
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:29 pm
- Location: new york
- Thanked: 2 times
Think about 0.beater wrote:Here is how I approached stat 1:
Stat 1:
m+n<0
m < -n
Values for m and n:
-2 < -1
-4 < -2
-5 < -4
As you can see none of the above values would allow m to equal n. Hence sufficient. However, there is definitely somethign wrong with my analysis becuase the answer is B. Could you please reivew my working and let me know what I'm doing wrong for statement 1. Thanks!
0<0 does not always satisfy the condition
-
bekkilyn
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 9:06 am
- Location: United States
- Thanked: 5 times
Here's what I'm getting. I also went ahead and changed m + n < 0 to m < -n.
For this first statement, m could equal n if m = -2 and n = - 2:
-2 + -2 < 0 or -2 < -(-2)
Or m could not equal n if m = -7 and n = 3:
-7 + 3 < 0 or -7 < -3.
Since m and n could either be equal or not equal, we don't have enough information to answer the question, so insufficient.
For this first statement, m could equal n if m = -2 and n = - 2:
-2 + -2 < 0 or -2 < -(-2)
Or m could not equal n if m = -7 and n = 3:
-7 + 3 < 0 or -7 < -3.
Since m and n could either be equal or not equal, we don't have enough information to answer the question, so insufficient.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
hmm.
in general, you will probably find that "m + n < 0" is a much more useful phrasing than is "m < -n".
if you don't see why, then consider a test case, such as m = -5, n = 6.
with the former version, it's easy to see that the statement is false; because the size (i.e., absolute value) of n is larger, it's easy to see that adding m + n will create a positive result.
with the latter version, it's much more difficult to verify the falsity of the given inequality, because not only do you have to flip the sign of the '6' but you also have to evaluate an inequality involving two negative numbers, which is not an easy thing to do.
in general, though, you should go with whichever rephrase is most convenient for you. if you are one of the select few who prefer "m < -n" to "m + n is negative", then go for it.
in general, you will probably find that "m + n < 0" is a much more useful phrasing than is "m < -n".
if you don't see why, then consider a test case, such as m = -5, n = 6.
with the former version, it's easy to see that the statement is false; because the size (i.e., absolute value) of n is larger, it's easy to see that adding m + n will create a positive result.
with the latter version, it's much more difficult to verify the falsity of the given inequality, because not only do you have to flip the sign of the '6' but you also have to evaluate an inequality involving two negative numbers, which is not an easy thing to do.
in general, though, you should go with whichever rephrase is most convenient for you. if you are one of the select few who prefer "m < -n" to "m + n is negative", then go for it.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
