ratios + weighted average

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

ratios + weighted average

by cramya » Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:00 pm
At a certain company, the average (arithmetic mean) number of years of experience is 9.8 years for the male employees and 9.1 years for the female employees. What is the ratio of the number of the company's male employees to the number of the company's female employee?

(1) There are 52 male employees at the company
(2) The average number of years of experience for the company's male and female employees combined is 9.3 years.



[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]

My question is how is the number of ears of service related to the number of males/females. Lets sa the average ears of experience of females
is 10 (there could be 2 females wiht 5 earsof experiecne each or 5 females with 2 ears of experience each) The ratio fo males to females changes.

Wh is not E)? Can someone please clear m confusion?
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:02 pm
The y key stopped responding on my key board so reposting the same question!



At a certain company, the average (arithmetic mean) number of years of experience is 9.8 years for the male employees and 9.1 years for the female employees. What is the ratio of the number of the company's male employees to the number of the company's female employee?

(1) There are 52 male employees at the company
(2) The average number of years of experience for the company's male and female employees combined is 9.3 years.



[spoiler]OA: B [/spoiler]
My question is how is the number of years of service related to the number of males/females. Lets sa the average ears of experience of females
is 10 (there could be 2 females wiht 5 earsof experiecne each or 5 females with 2 ears of experience each) The ratio fo males to females changes.

Why is not E)? Can someone please clear my confusion?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:09 pm
Sorry for the confusion

I figured it out!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:15 pm
About weighted averages, I'd just add that in any weighted average problem involving two groups, if you have any three of the following, you can always find the fourth:

-the average of group 1 (men, in the question above)
-the average of group 2 (women, in the question above)
-the overall average (all employees, in the question above)
-the ratio of group 1 to group 2 (ratio of male to female employees in the above)

This can be quite useful to know for DS questions; it lets you solve the above problem in a few seconds, since with Statement 2 we have three of the four items above, so can find the fourth, and Statement 1 is clearly insufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:12 pm
Thanks Ian!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:43 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:650

by California4jx » Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:27 am
The average of averages =
Sum of experiences of both groups / total employees

9.3 = (M)(9.8) +(F)(9.1) / (M + F)

from there - you can find M/F
Sufficient.